Was the Bosnian genocide bad? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 03:06:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Was the Bosnian genocide bad? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Was the Bosnian genocide bad?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 41

Author Topic: Was the Bosnian genocide bad?  (Read 702 times)
vitoNova
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,285
United States


« on: January 24, 2022, 07:32:52 PM »

It was simply atrocious.

The Serbian 'Chetniks' were basically a Russian orthodox version of the Waffen SS. Australian sentiment about Serbian war crimes including Srebrenica still linger today.

When you visit Bosnia, you find that the people are harmless and peace loving. It was disgraceful that Dutch UN troops stood by and let it happen.

A Cry From The Grave

https://youtu.be/YhvCBC2nlro

11,000 men and boys killed or missing, presumed killed.

Basically an equivalent scenario to the SS Jewish massacres in Eastern Europe in 1941.

The total WW2 Jewish dead involved in Europe was due to about 1,000 Srebrenicas for scale.





The Dutch still feel pretty bad about that whole affair to this day.

The Dutch service-members I served with referred to Srebenica as "our Dutch Vietnam". Even though they were children when that whole thing happened in (I think?) the 90s.  So obviously it is singed in their collective memory.  
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.