Opinion of MR politics (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 07:14:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Opinion of MR politics (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Opinion of MR politics
#1
Freedom Fighter
 
#2
Horrible Person
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: Opinion of MR politics  (Read 8638 times)
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« on: November 12, 2008, 07:34:49 AM »

Look at this little nugget I stumbled upon.

The Jews comment was anti - Zionism and rejection of neoconservatives.  Which is funny to hear Libs bash me over considering.

Idiot?

I have been right more on a number of issues so far that alot of you won't admit.

After all the defending I have did of Obama seems his supporters here would be more nice.

Thanks for the complements.
Logged
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2008, 08:54:48 AM »



That hurts my feelings.
Logged
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2008, 08:09:15 PM »

It almost hurts to see my fellow South Carolinian get torn up like this.

Yep, considering I defended there guy all over this forum.

I have nothing against Jewish people.

I Actually liked Obamas chief of staff pick.
Logged
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2008, 10:48:35 PM »

These threads are getting kind of mean

Yep, they sure are.

Great forum, but my time is up here.

Good luck with the personal attacks.
Logged
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2008, 12:10:09 PM »

First off, the assassins post was a attempt at sarcasm. Its using "Coincidental " facts to make a point. If you want to waste your time on this , then that's you.

Fact 1. Obama has not campaigned in West VA during the presidential election other then sending Joe Biden.

Fact 2. Obama has not did much campaigning in the DEEP south states since the primaries ( when's the last time he's came to visit me in Sc?.. ahh I went to see him in Clemson back in Feb).

Those are just Coincidental facts.  I thought the pictures that some of you posted after I said that was pretty funny, which the comment was meant to do.

Mr Resident bill Ayers:
 If you wanted to make this a big deal then you should have did it weeks ago when I made the post.   

Next off,  You said that I should  "probably stay away from the whole Zionism issue" Who are you to tell me what views I should stay away from?   Iam going to say this for the last time I HAVE NOTHING AGAINST PEOPLE OF JEWISH DECENT!!  and if that's not good enough, then maybe you have problems.  Iam sorry if in my political thinking/ views I feel that our countries leaders should put the united states of America FIRST. That's pure political OP shared my many other Americans.  Did I say that in the wrong way.... yes did.  I refined that comment afterwards.  Gaffes are gaffes and people make them all the time if you can't get over that fact or just don't understand, then once again its you with the problem.
Iam not going to give lip service to the Obama supporters or the republican supporters.
My views are what they are and please don't tell me how my views should be shaped again.
If you get your rocks off by hurling insults and flexing egos sitting behind a keyboard then I guess I shouldn't be that pissed considering your sad state of a life.

This is great forum with smart political junkies something you don't find other places
( Myspace for ex). 



"I've been trying to stay "toned", but my biceps are starting to hurt."   Iam sorry did I misspell something for you?   Please, Stay Tuned  and I will misspell some more in the future. Besides working out is good for your health.

Lastly, to say that I don't understand or the word idiotic get tossed my way is pure BS.
Bottom line, its not like iam in the constitutional law section making stupid posts, or pretending to know the subjects.  I pick the subjects I can give my political insight to in - which most of the time iam either on par with others or accurate.  I have saw many posts that most of you were giving a OP that was wrong, but its your political opinion.   Iam not going to call you a idiot because you posted a map of Obama winning GA.   But if thats the way things go around here then most likely, I won't be sticking around for that nonsense.
 

Mr Eraserhead ... if was of Catholic Faith why should it be done away with?


Sorry Mod if I sound like Iam Pissed.


Logged
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2008, 12:19:09 PM »

Fact 1. Obama has not campaigned in West VA during the presidential election other then sending Joe Biden.

False. He did in the primary.

Fact 2. Obama has not did much campaigning in the DEEP south states since the primaries ( when's the last time he's came to visit me in Sc?.. ahh I went to see him in Clemson back in Feb).

Yes, and he didn't do any campaigning in Utah or Idaho either. I wonder why?


You can't read now?

Fact 1. Obama has not campaigned in West VA during the presidential election other then sending Joe Biden.
Logged
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2008, 01:17:59 PM »

Yes, but he still set foot in this so so extremely dangerous state during the primary.

In the general he only sent Biden, let's see, send the running mate to second-tier swing states while the candidate focuses on the main ones needed to win the election? No, that can't be...

First off, the assassins post was a attempt at sarcasm. Its using "Coincidental " facts to make a point. If you want to waste your time on this , then that's you.

Fact 1. Obama has not campaigned in West VA during the presidential election other then sending Joe Biden.

Fact 2. Obama has not did much campaigning in the DEEP south states since the primaries ( when's the last time he's came to visit me in Sc?.. ahh I went to see him in Clemson back in Feb).

Those are just Coincidental facts.  I thought the pictures that some of you posted after I said that was pretty funny, which the comment was meant to do.

What part of that didn't you understand?

You are being hackish in a attempt at making a hill into a Mountian.

Logged
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2008, 07:48:54 PM »

Yes, but he still set foot in this so so extremely dangerous state during the primary.

In the general he only sent Biden, let's see, send the running mate to second-tier swing states while the candidate focuses on the main ones needed to win the election? No, that can't be...

First off, the assassins post was a attempt at sarcasm. Its using "Coincidental " facts to make a point. If you want to waste your time on this , then that's you.

Fact 1. Obama has not campaigned in West VA during the presidential election other then sending Joe Biden.

Fact 2. Obama has not did much campaigning in the DEEP south states since the primaries ( when's the last time he's came to visit me in Sc?.. ahh I went to see him in Clemson back in Feb).

Those are just Coincidental facts.  I thought the pictures that some of you posted after I said that was pretty funny, which the comment was meant to do.

What part of that didn't you understand?

You are being hackish in a attempt at making a hill into a Mountian.

So instead of responding to my counter-points you just repeat the exact same post I put them up against. Wonderful.

Once again, if West Virginia is full of hordes of skilled racist assassins who are still somehow magically confined within the state's borders (and can't even reach Virginia, Ohio or Pennsylvania), then why did Obama campaign there in the primary, especially since he didn't even need it? Did they all magically appear in June?

As for sending Biden there, you'll note that Biden traveled to more long-shot states, while Obama focused on the top-tier must-win states. So Obama focused on a winning strategy while Biden tested the waters for other possibilities? No wait, that doesn't make any sense at all.

Obama campaign as much in the Deep South post-primary as he did in Wyoming or Utah. Safety reasons in those states as well? Or did he simply logically focus only on states he had a chance of winning? Anyone who's passed an 8th grade government class should be able to answer this. At least explain the reason behind the "coincidental" fact that McCain never campaigned in New York, Massachusetts or Vermont.

BTW you still have yet to reveal this source.

  There you go again.


If you look up the word  "sarcasm"  you would understand things better.  But you don't want to do that,  you want badger me.
Now I don't understand 8th grade Gov?

Go back a review my posts and you will see that I do understand elections, however iam not a pollster or do I pretend to be one like some.
   
"Coincidental  facts " is something  you must not understand.

Iam done with addressing this issue with you.
Logged
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2008, 08:06:24 PM »


The best advice you have gave in the whole thread.
Logged
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2008, 09:20:25 PM »

Yes, but he still set foot in this so so extremely dangerous state during the primary.

In the general he only sent Biden, let's see, send the running mate to second-tier swing states while the candidate focuses on the main ones needed to win the election? No, that can't be...

First off, the assassins post was a attempt at sarcasm. Its using "Coincidental " facts to make a point. If you want to waste your time on this , then that's you.

Fact 1. Obama has not campaigned in West VA during the presidential election other then sending Joe Biden.

Fact 2. Obama has not did much campaigning in the DEEP south states since the primaries ( when's the last time he's came to visit me in Sc?.. ahh I went to see him in Clemson back in Feb).

Those are just Coincidental facts.  I thought the pictures that some of you posted after I said that was pretty funny, which the comment was meant to do.

What part of that didn't you understand?

You are being hackish in a attempt at making a hill into a Mountian.

So instead of responding to my counter-points you just repeat the exact same post I put them up against. Wonderful.

Once again, if West Virginia is full of hordes of skilled racist assassins who are still somehow magically confined within the state's borders (and can't even reach Virginia, Ohio or Pennsylvania), then why did Obama campaign there in the primary, especially since he didn't even need it? Did they all magically appear in June?

As for sending Biden there, you'll note that Biden traveled to more long-shot states, while Obama focused on the top-tier must-win states. So Obama focused on a winning strategy while Biden tested the waters for other possibilities? No wait, that doesn't make any sense at all.

Obama campaign as much in the Deep South post-primary as he did in Wyoming or Utah. Safety reasons in those states as well? Or did he simply logically focus only on states he had a chance of winning? Anyone who's passed an 8th grade government class should be able to answer this. At least explain the reason behind the "coincidental" fact that McCain never campaigned in New York, Massachusetts or Vermont.

BTW you still have yet to reveal this source.

  There you go again.


If you look up the word  "sarcasm"  you would understand things better.  But you don't want to do that,  you want badger me.
Now I don't understand 8th grade Gov?

Go back a review my posts and you will see that I do understand elections, however iam not a pollster or do I pretend to be one like some.
   
"Coincidental  facts " is something  you must not understand.

Iam done with addressing this issue with you.


The 8th grade Government class was in reference to anyone who understand the electoral college understanding why Obama would not campaign in the Deep South.


Mr Resident of  Bill Ayers America:

I know the electoral college system.

You are saying I don't know the Electoral college now?   Gee I think the term "bunch of jerks" was fits you and others here pretty well.
Logged
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2008, 09:49:52 PM »

Yes, but he still set foot in this so so extremely dangerous state during the primary.

In the general he only sent Biden, let's see, send the running mate to second-tier swing states while the candidate focuses on the main ones needed to win the election? No, that can't be...

First off, the assassins post was a attempt at sarcasm. Its using "Coincidental " facts to make a point. If you want to waste your time on this , then that's you.

Fact 1. Obama has not campaigned in West VA during the presidential election other then sending Joe Biden.

Fact 2. Obama has not did much campaigning in the DEEP south states since the primaries ( when's the last time he's came to visit me in Sc?.. ahh I went to see him in Clemson back in Feb).

Those are just Coincidental facts.  I thought the pictures that some of you posted after I said that was pretty funny, which the comment was meant to do.

What part of that didn't you understand?

You are being hackish in a attempt at making a hill into a Mountian.

So instead of responding to my counter-points you just repeat the exact same post I put them up against. Wonderful.

Once again, if West Virginia is full of hordes of skilled racist assassins who are still somehow magically confined within the state's borders (and can't even reach Virginia, Ohio or Pennsylvania), then why did Obama campaign there in the primary, especially since he didn't even need it? Did they all magically appear in June?

As for sending Biden there, you'll note that Biden traveled to more long-shot states, while Obama focused on the top-tier must-win states. So Obama focused on a winning strategy while Biden tested the waters for other possibilities? No wait, that doesn't make any sense at all.

Obama campaign as much in the Deep South post-primary as he did in Wyoming or Utah. Safety reasons in those states as well? Or did he simply logically focus only on states he had a chance of winning? Anyone who's passed an 8th grade government class should be able to answer this. At least explain the reason behind the "coincidental" fact that McCain never campaigned in New York, Massachusetts or Vermont.

BTW you still have yet to reveal this source.

  There you go again.


If you look up the word  "sarcasm"  you would understand things better.  But you don't want to do that,  you want badger me.
Now I don't understand 8th grade Gov?

Go back a review my posts and you will see that I do understand elections, however iam not a pollster or do I pretend to be one like some.
   
"Coincidental  facts " is something  you must not understand.

Iam done with addressing this issue with you.


The 8th grade Government class was in reference to anyone who understand the electoral college understanding why Obama would not campaign in the Deep South.


Mr Resident of  Bill Ayers America:

I know the electoral college system.

You are saying I don't know the Electoral college now?   Gee I think the term "bunch of jerks" was fits you and others here pretty well.

If you think the reason Obama didn't campaign in the Deep South was anything other than the Electoral College (or that it was anything near "coincidental", then you don't understand the Electoral College.

Obama didn't campaign in states he couldn't win. DUH IT'S BLATANTLY FUCKING OBVIOUS. It has nothing to do with these supposed mysterious racist assassins who are magically confined to not leaving their states' borders.

Better add another vote to my HP rating.

You can't read or atleast you like to skip over things.  DUH IT'S BLATANTLY FUCKING OBVIOUS that I  already explained to you what that post was all about.   You continue to want a fight over this like a mindless idiot.



Logged
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« Reply #11 on: November 15, 2008, 01:00:53 AM »

Yes, it's obvious what that post was about. You claimed to have a "source" that you said you would possibly reveal after the election but have given no hints whatsoever toward who claims that Obama has not visited West Virginia out of safety concerns. Yet as I pointed out you still have zero evidence toward that, or any counter-arguments toward the ridiculous assumption that there are particularly dangerous states for Obama to visit.


You really want that source huh?


It was attempt at sarcasm, however with the way that you really are eager to debate this iam starting to wonder.

Did I make a valid point by mistake?

Logged
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« Reply #12 on: November 15, 2008, 01:07:58 AM »



LOL you are a asshole hack you know that.

Yeah, the Bradley effect is real and just because Obama won the election does not change the past.
In fact if anything there was a small reverse Bradley effect.

You are reaching dude.
Logged
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« Reply #13 on: November 15, 2008, 01:18:00 AM »

Yes, it's obvious what that post was about. You claimed to have a "source" that you said you would possibly reveal after the election but have given no hints whatsoever toward who claims that Obama has not visited West Virginia out of safety concerns. Yet as I pointed out you still have zero evidence toward that, or any counter-arguments toward the ridiculous assumption that there are particularly dangerous states for Obama to visit.


You really want that source huh?


It was attempt at sarcasm, however with the way that you really are eager to debate this iam starting to wonder.

Did I make a valid point by mistake?

When you're sarcastic, you don't claim to have a nonexistent source, or make counterarguments defending your "point" as you later did to me and Lunar.



LOL you are a asshole hack you know that.

Yeah, the Bradley effect is real and just because Obama won the election does not change the past.
In fact if anything there was a small reverse Bradley effect.

You are reaching dude.

Where's the evidence of people lying en masse to pollsters saying they were voting Obama and then voting McCain?


Didn't happen this time, or if it did not enough to effect the election.

The reverse may have happened to McCain.

The Bradley effect was many moons ago and things have changed, however its not a myth.
Logged
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« Reply #14 on: November 16, 2008, 12:24:45 AM »

No, that's actually rather disputable. In the last poll Bradley's lead was only by one point. It had greatly diminished, and there were a ton of other factors against him.

We are talking about McCain right?

Logged
MR maverick
MR politics
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 585
United States


« Reply #15 on: November 16, 2008, 05:25:54 PM »

I Know a older white woman age 67 that said she had voted for democrats all her life, but wouldn't be voting for "that Osama bama" she called him.


That was before the election.

I have now found out that she voted for Obama afterall.

This is just one case, but iam sure theres more cases like this.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 11 queries.