Sex-Orientation Discrimination Bill (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 10:18:32 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Sex-Orientation Discrimination Bill (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How would you vote on it?
#1
Democrat -Aye
 
#2
Democrat -Nay
 
#3
Republican -Aye
 
#4
Republican -Nay
 
#5
independent/third party -Aye
 
#6
independent/third party -Nay
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 41

Author Topic: Sex-Orientation Discrimination Bill  (Read 5526 times)
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

« on: January 22, 2006, 10:34:40 PM »

I'd have to see the whole text of the bill to decide.  What's presented here seems uncontroversial, but I suspect there's more to it than what has been presented here if they've been having trouble getting it passed in a liberal state.
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2006, 10:43:05 PM »

What's presented here seems uncontroversial...

Uncontroversial? I suppose among those who hate freedom, yes.

I mean, it doesn't really seem like anything not already covered in other laws.  Maybe I'm missing something.
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2006, 10:48:29 PM »

What's presented here seems uncontroversial...

Uncontroversial? I suppose among those who hate freedom, yes.

I mean, it doesn't really seem like anything not already covered in other laws.  Maybe I'm missing something.

Other laws like what? The Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not cover all discrimination.

Yes, that's true.  I really didn't read it that carefully, since I'm tired and about to hit the hay.  I'm surprised any 'rights' bill is having trouble getting passed in a liberal state like Washington.  There must be something controversial to it, even for blue-staters.
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2006, 08:51:04 PM »

Aye - I'm vehemenently opposed to all forms of discrimination (and yes, I include affirmative action)

Dave

What about competence?  Isn't only hiring a person you perceive as competent a form of discrimination?

You're getting a little PC here, man.  Face the facts -- we discriminate every day, in many, many ways.  The question is not whether we discriminate, but whether we do it on valid grounds.
Logged
dazzleman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,777
Political Matrix
E: 1.88, S: 1.59

« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2006, 10:07:32 PM »

Obviously Emsworth, Jake, A18 and the others here have never experienced discrimination before, so they don't know what they're talking about.
How exactly would you be in a position to know whether any of us has experienced discrimination? In any event, whether we have or have not experienced it is completely irrelevant.

I am 100% sure that none of you have experienced the type of discrimination this bill aims to prevent. It may be irrelevant, I wasn't making a legal arguement. A person's experience with discrimination directly affects his views, so it is related.

Pym, is there something you want to tell us?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.