Kinda disappointing how few posters have actually placed MarkD so far in the list 
He's a bit nutter, no? I think I'd put you there before him. Not sure but maybe.
He's not?
He has an interesting philosophy with regards to the court and is honestly very objective in his values with regard to the court. He wanted to see sodomy laws repealed in the 1980s as he himself is gay but at the same time disagreed with Texas v Lawrence in 2003. Maybe you don't have to see his view as correct but if one was to place a token "right winger" on the court it would obviously have to be MarkD.
Opposing a fundamental right to privacy isn't "interesting", it's destructive. This is America, not North Korea.
