Re: Office of PSOL—Beginning of the Institute of Atlasian Progression (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 26, 2024, 01:42:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Re: Office of PSOL—Beginning of the Institute of Atlasian Progression (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Re: Office of PSOL—Beginning of the Institute of Atlasian Progression  (Read 17201 times)
SevenEleven
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,603


« on: July 30, 2020, 04:05:11 PM »
« edited: July 30, 2020, 04:11:07 PM by Sev »

Endorsed!

"labor aristocratic party"
I appreciate the choice of "aristocratic" instead of "elitist" because the second sounds too much like far-right lingo.

I might have gone with "oligarchical" myself, but "aristocratic" works too.
No need to remind you that you owe all your atlasian career to me and to Truman. I guess you were fine with this "oligarchic" party then

Uhm. This shows a lack of respect towards other members. What HenryWallaceVP accomplished, is something he did by himself. Everyone has his own choice and opinion. It's not that hard to understand. You prove that Labor is all about taking positions, offering them to people and make them obey the party leadership. Pretty much a textbook case of a dictatorial one party state [biwhere everrything you accomplished is by obeying party leadership. You alwayd owe the dictator something. If you fail to obey you'll be put in a prison camp[/b]. I say no to such a society.

I feel that I am proof that isn't true at all. I'm independent-minded and even left Labor at one point. I've never been told to vote a certain way by anyone in Labor. If you are committed to a progressive agenda, then you should have no problem with or working with the Labor Party.
Logged
SevenEleven
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,603


« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2020, 03:15:14 AM »

Welcome to the party. We don't always agree in Labor, but we commit to progress and strive to do the best to represent our constituents and ensure the nation is better off.
Logged
SevenEleven
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,603


« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2020, 03:22:36 AM »

As of right now, I’m handing in my resignation as chair of the Green Party, effectively dissolving it.

Unfortunately, at this point you have no authority to appoint yourself. It's also questionable whether you would had the Green Party stayed intact, considering the vacancy is due to a deregistered member of no current party.
Logged
SevenEleven
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,603


« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2020, 03:27:26 AM »

As of right now, I’m handing in my resignation as chair of the Green Party, effectively dissolving it.

Unfortunately, at this point you have no authority to appoint yourself. It's also questionable whether you would had the Green Party stayed intact, considering the vacancy is due to a deregistered member of no current party.

Lakigigar deregistered as a green member so his replacement is still appointed by the Greens party chair.

PSOL resigned as Green Party chair.
Logged
SevenEleven
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,603


« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2020, 03:34:51 AM »

As of right now, I’m handing in my resignation as chair of the Green Party, effectively dissolving it.

Unfortunately, at this point you have no authority to appoint yourself. It's also questionable whether you would had the Green Party stayed intact, considering the vacancy is due to a deregistered member of no current party.

Lakigigar deregistered as a green member so his replacement is still appointed by the Greens party chair.

PSOL resigned as Green Party chair.
I wonder if it’s possible for Zinneke to take over the party?

Not according to your bylaws.
Logged
SevenEleven
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,603


« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2020, 03:58:15 AM »

Based on the party's by-laws, there must be a new election for any officer(s) who have vacated (this includes PSOL, plus any others I'm not aware of):

Quote
"Rights and privileges of the party include: voting for party and representative officials for public office"

In fact, this explicitly states that once new officer(s) are elected, the party membership must then choose any replacement for Representative once the executive of the party is chosen.
Hmm, that could be doable

Since there are no provisions in the bylaws, it can't be legally justified.
Logged
SevenEleven
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,603


« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2020, 04:12:52 AM »

Based on the party's by-laws, there must be a new election for any officer(s) who have vacated (this includes PSOL, plus any others I'm not aware of):

Quote
"Rights and privileges of the party include: voting for party and representative officials for public office"

In fact, this explicitly states that once new officer(s) are elected, the party membership must then choose any replacement for Representative once the executive of the party is chosen.
Hmm, that could be doable

Since there are no provisions in the bylaws, it can't be legally justified.
The way I invisioned it would be that it would be lax and open to experimenting

Open to experimenting is good, but not necessarily for a healthy party.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 12 queries.