What does your 2024 map look like right now? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 06:12:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  2024 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, GeorgiaModerate, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  What does your 2024 map look like right now? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What does your 2024 map look like right now?  (Read 6209 times)
Real Texan Politics
EEllis02
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,605
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -1.57

P P P
WWW
« on: November 12, 2020, 03:31:12 AM »



Tucker Carlson / Josh Hawley (R) - 311
Kamala Harris / Stacey Abrams (D) - 227

Of course it's likely this scenario doesn't happen but it's always fun to speculate.

Anyways, some explanations on why certain states went their ways...

Georgia would stay titanium tilt D for this cycle with Stacey Abrams on the ticket, but Stacey would also hold many rallies throughout the state to increase turnout, especially in the Atlanta suburbs. It's possible Tucker could flip it back into his column without Stacey on the dem ticket, but even then it would be dangerously close.

NE-02 is a lost cause for republicans. It swung so hard to Biden this time around that I don't see it flipping back anytime soon. Tucker could get it within 3 but either way a loss is a loss.

Tucker would make a major play for the rust belt with not only the blue wall trio of WI, MI, and PA, but also with Minnesota. He would hold numerous rallies in the union and industrial parts of the states like the Minnesota Iron Range, Pittsburgh, Detroit, Flint, and Scranton. Michigan and Minnesota could go either way in this scenario, but I have them tilting ever so slightly to Tucker.

Tucker could also make Nevada and New Hampshire a lot more competitive this cycle like Trump in 2016, and possibly to the point of winning both of them if a major scandal surrounding him weren't to occur (maybe Trump could've won both of those along with Minnesota in 2016 if it weren't for Access Hollywood?).

Arizona could flip back if Tucker improves in the suburbs, but that's another state I'm weary about.

Anyways if this makes no sense to some of y'all, I was typing this all out at like 2:30 in the morning lol
Logged
Real Texan Politics
EEllis02
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,605
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -1.57

P P P
WWW
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2020, 06:05:14 PM »


Wouldn't mind having Yang as prez but I got a couple of problems with that post:

1. Dianne Feinstein....no, just no.

2. That map is either satirical or makes no sense, or both.
Logged
Real Texan Politics
EEllis02
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,605
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: -1.57

P P P
WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2020, 12:37:34 AM »


Harris/Cooper (D) 309 EV / 51% (312 before reapportionment)
Haley/Cotton (R) 229 EV / 47% (226 before reapportionment)

I don't see any scenario happening in which Nikki Haley loses Georgia and North Carolina. Honestly a Haley/Cotton ticket is perfect for the region.

Possibly Arizona and less likely Nevada flip to Nikki but that may be pushing it. NE-02 could also flip back but considering how far left it swung this time she'd have to be lucky to win it.

Also ME-02 should be republican. Even if Nikki underperforms Trump, she still wins it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 10 queries.