Were the events of 1989/1991 good to the mankind? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 08:10:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Were the events of 1989/1991 good to the mankind? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Were the events of 1989/1991 good to the mankind?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 38

Author Topic: Were the events of 1989/1991 good to the mankind?  (Read 2495 times)
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« on: July 09, 2017, 06:54:51 AM »

My dad grew up for 40 years in a Eastern bloc Communist country and he used to tell me: ''In Communism you weren't allowed to vote but there were no problems but in America you always vote and there's always problems.''


No problems hahahaha

"Death solves all problems, no man, no problem!" - Stalin
Logged
Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
Moderators
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 54,118
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2017, 07:10:29 AM »

I would probably rather live in Soviet Russia than modern Russia.

Modern Russia is just a complete mess.


Russia is a mess today, because of the USSR.


People in this thread seem to be decoupling the "collapse of the USSR" from the USSR itself, which ignores the fact that the collapse was caused by the way the USSR had developed and the way it was led and especially its economic situation.

The USSR collapsed because it was a entity established at the point of a machine gun, by thugs, murderers and ideological quacks. Everything from its manner of economic development to its repressive government were contributing factors to its eventual demise.

The only reason why things were somewhat more glued together before the collapse, was the force of inertia created by it being a totalitarian regime, and as along as the government could impose its will, things would remain glued together. The problem is that the USSR's ability to enforce its will on its people was eroded by its economic weaknesses, foreign policy adventurism and incompetence.

The mess that was left behind following the Soviet Union's collapse is a product of the Soviet Union's existence in the first place.

Russia had always been a reactionary power, a highly religious country and a country that has largely focused inward but desired means by which to interact with the world. These three considerations dictated every decision made under the Tsars for hundreds of years. The fact that Russia has reverted to being a reactionary power (propping up right wing political movements), a highly religious country and one focused inward but always desiring access beyond (Crimea), illustrates more than anything the failure of communism to rewrite the destiny of a culture or to erase innate nationalistic tendencies. Russia looks more like it did in 1900 than it did in 1985.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.