SENATE BILL: Comprehensive Drug Reform Act of 2013 (Law'd)

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor: TNF

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Okay, whats the story with this Senator?

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor Feedback: Hostile
Status: Vote to commence later this afternoon. Unless storms drive me off before then or something.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Its still 50 minutes away, damn.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor Feedback: Hostile
Status: A vote is now open on the above amendment, please vote Aye, Nay or Abstain.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

AYE

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Vote on Amendment 56:26 by Maxwell:

Aye (6): bore, Gass3268, Maxwell, NC Yankee, sbane and Xahar
Nay (1): TNF
Abstain (1): TJ in Cleve

Not Voting (2): Napoleon and Tmthforu94

The amendment has been adopted.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

What is the tax that is on them now?


I would go as high as possible on most all such substances were the threat of increasing smuggling not a substantial concern at a certain point. Up to that point, I probably wouldn't have any complaints.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

 

What say you all about taxing harder drugs?

35%? I don't know the measurements of everything, so maybe someone else can do something about that, but let's start there.

And I think TNF is talking about stuff that isn't currently legal.

Aye, I am. Is anyone here an expert on measurements of hard drugs?

Unfortunately it has been a good five years or so since I took that elective course on criminology, which included a review of most drugs, which is probably why I didn't pick up on the fact that you were talking about substances that are still illegal.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Amendment is hostile. I believe in the right to smoke in public, be it tobacco or marijuana.

I am in full agreement, and I don't think I get why one is being marked out and not the other.

I am in full disagreement because I think one's freedom ends where your decisions (especially irresponsbile decisions, which is how I would regard smoking of any form) effects someone else and thus there is a perfectly good arguement from a standpoint of preserving freedom, to side with the non-smokers in terms of the regulating of the public space one way or the other. I view it no different then I would clean water or clean air legislation, which is preserving the right of the masses to have access to the necessities of life without having to absorb Dow's wastes.

I oppose the amendment though, because it creates a senseless double standard. Smoke is smoke at the end of the day and a smoking ban that doesn't apply to both just screams of an indefensible personal bias (I concede that I am fully biased against all forms of smoking, but I think that my endorsement of a smoking ban is justifiable on the grounds stated above).

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor Feedback: Hostile
Status: Vote this afternoon, about eight hours from now is the earliest time.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

I generally approve of public smoking bans because I feel that other people's freedom from smoke is more important than your freedom to smoke. The reason I just scored out tobacco was because I am aware of the dangers of secondhand tobacco smoke in terms of cancer, in a way I'm not for cannabis. Having said that I wouldn't mind allowing regions to ban smoking that in public, if it became clear that was a public health issue as well.

At the end of the day smoke inhalation is unhealthy regardless of what is being burned. Smoke is the by product of the combustion of some flamable solid substance. When its burned you get the smoke composed of carbon dioxide as well as other gases and mixed into that is solid particulate matter derived from the substance in question. At the very least the particulate matter and its impact on the lining of the lungs, as well as the inhaling of unnatural (carbon dioxide for one, which is supposed to be exhaled not inhaled) gaseous substances which has the same displacement effect vis a vis oxygen (which in turn forces the cardiovascular system to work double time to compensate. Think of a delivery truck delivering the a certain percentage of the wrong shipment, in a demand side system. The truck gets worn out quicker. That is why heart disease is a more common killer for smokers then cancer), regardless of what that substance the combustion of which the smoke is derived. To be or not to be carcinogen risk really is only one of the considerations and the revelation that it has a lower cancer risk has served to create a false perception that it is safe from all potential health concerns.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor Feedback: Hostile
Status: A vote is now open on the above amendment, Senators please vote Aye, Nay or Abstain.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

NAY

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

4-5-0-1 w/ three days

With Xahar not voting

Do we really have waste three days here?

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Two days


Come on damn it!!! This is ridiculous.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Funny I seem to recall voting the same way as you.

Or do you mean the inactivity? Well yes, my answer to that is same regardless of whether it is a Revolution or not.

FIX BAYONETS!!!!

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

One day

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Vote on Amendment 56:31 by bore:

Aye (4): bore, Gass3268, TJ in Cleve and Tmthforu94
Nay (5): Maxwell, Napoleon, NC Yankee, sbane and TNF
Abstain (0):

Didn't Vote (1): Xahar

The amendment has been rejected.


I will vote to remove the whole clause if such was offered.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor Feedback: Hostile
Status: A vote in a few hours. I will try to get back on just prior to midnight to do this but it may be in the mid morning.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

I didn't start the vote yet. The topic line hadn't been changed from the last one. Sorry for the confusion.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Sponsor Feedback: Hostile
Status: A vote is now open on the above amendment, please vote Aye, Nay or Abstain.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

AYE

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

4-4-0-2

With Xahar and Maxwell having yet to vote.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Could we see the compromise? If iti s acceptable, I will switch to get this vote over sooner.