Smid v. Hughento v. Polnut v. Conor (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 05:43:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community
  Forum Community Election Match-ups (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Smid v. Hughento v. Polnut v. Conor (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Rumble Down Under!
#1
Smid/Smid		  
#2
Smid/Hughento		  
#3
Smid/Polnut		  
#4
Smid/Conor		  
#5
Hughento/Smid		  
#6
Hughento/Hughento		  
#7
Hughento/Polnut		  
#8
Hughento/Conor		  
#9
Polnut/Smid		  
#10
Polnut/Hughento		  
#11
Polnut/Polnut		  
#12
Polnut/Conor		  
#13
Conor/Smid		  
#14
Conor/Hughento		  
#15
Conor/Polnut		  
#16
Conor/Conor		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 22

Author Topic: Smid v. Hughento v. Polnut v. Conor  (Read 1795 times)
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,271
United States


« on: January 01, 2009, 11:45:24 PM »
     Smid/Smid. If IRV is not used, he would win pretty decisively.
Logged
Associate Justice PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,271
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2009, 01:05:01 AM »
Quote from: Che Fatwa on January 02, 2009, 12:28:36 AM
Quote from: Senator PiT on January 01, 2009, 11:45:24 PM
     Smid/Smid. If IRV is not used, he would win pretty decisively.

It's an Australian matchup. Of course there's IRV!

     There isn't any IRV until I say that there's IRV. Got it? Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.