But can you blame them? The exigencies of intersectional progressive thought in 2016 pull people in contradictory, opposing directions. Take this interview of Priyanka Chopra from the same website:
This is obviously wrong, according to the required world view. Colorblindedness is at best naive and at worst-- which here means "actually"-- is a means of perpetuating white privilege and the oppression of people of color (see here). (As an aside I would like to register my continuing objection to the usurpation of the term "brown people", which clearly is supposed to refer to South Asians, by Hispanics; also note the capitalization of "Black".)
Chopra falls into language of "all women", which marginalizes the experiences of Black and brown women, and veers dangerously close to the invisibilizing sloganeering of "All Lives Matter".
Yet the same website not only fails to condemn her, but paints her in a positive light! A right winger can almost sympathise for the poor "woke" progressive who tries to keep up with it all; if not empathise outright, thanks to Donald Trump. Also, Idris Elba should obviously be the next James Bond.
In a way intersectionality is kind of like chivalry, in that people are expected to live by a complex code of conduct that nobody can keep up with in every aspect. In some ways it's even worse though, in that chivalry at least didn't change day by day.
Living in a very progressive area, I can easily empathize with people who have to worry constantly about whether they are saying the right thing; I've seen it happen plenty. I just avoid talking to them about politics, even on issues where I agree with them. Political discourse with the "woke" progressive is like walking through a minefield.