The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 04:31:05 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread (search mode)
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18
Author Topic: The Official Obama Approval Ratings Thread  (Read 1265162 times)
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #325 on: December 22, 2009, 08:13:49 PM »

The new map starts today. I'm not going to differentiate between whether he is at 51% or 65% approval. Green is if he is over 50% approval, and red is if he is under 50% approval. It might take me a bit to go back and find the last legitimate polls for each state, so bear with me(if you want to help to, that would be great).
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #326 on: December 22, 2009, 08:47:30 PM »
« Edited: December 22, 2009, 08:56:24 PM by RowanBrandon »

Okay guys, how's this? I tried to go back and find the polls. I am almost 100% sure there was a Georgia poll somewhere but I must have missed it going back, so if someone could bring it up that would be great. Also, if you know any of the other states that I have as gray on this map, that would be great as well. Also, if you feel like I have made any mistakes on the states please let me know. I want this as accurate as possible.

Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #327 on: December 22, 2009, 09:03:26 PM »

Obama is at 60% in only one state(MD), so it is dark green. He is at 60% disapproval in some states, so they are dark red.

Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #328 on: December 22, 2009, 09:58:42 PM »

How do I do that?
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #329 on: December 22, 2009, 10:43:20 PM »
« Edited: December 25, 2009, 12:11:17 PM by RowanBrandon »

I can't get Maine and Nebraska to not show up. The rest are all good though.



Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #330 on: December 23, 2009, 08:37:17 AM »
« Edited: December 23, 2009, 09:35:13 AM by RowanBrandon »

Gracias, Smiley.

What did you do to the code to get it like that?
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #331 on: December 23, 2009, 10:21:53 AM »

Kentucky(PPP)

Approve 35%
Disapprove 59%

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_KY_1223.pdf

No change to the map, essentially the same as the SUSA poll.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #332 on: December 23, 2009, 12:42:22 PM »

Does anyone want me to start making a map?

A few rules I would follow:

1. All polls must be approval, not favorability

2. No Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor polls

3. No internal polls


In theory, you should not mix adult, RV and LV voters polls but I know that it's impossible due to the weak number of polls. 

I would definitely agree, but like you said, there simply aren't enough polls to do this.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #333 on: December 23, 2009, 12:55:38 PM »

If both LV's and RV's are over 50%(or under 50%), the map doesn't make a difference anyway. If there is a discrepancy(one over 50%, one under 50%), I would probably just take the average of the two.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #334 on: December 24, 2009, 02:34:01 PM »

Is there any chance the shading could be made more dramatic-- especially since there are only 2 or 3 shades max? It's hard to see the difference currently.

I was thinking about that. Maybe something like a different shade for 55% or 60%?
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #335 on: December 24, 2009, 08:18:47 PM »
« Edited: December 24, 2009, 08:27:07 PM by RowanBrandon »

This thread has turned into a giant clusterfock.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #336 on: December 25, 2009, 03:21:11 PM »

How is this guys?



30-39%- Dark Dark Red
40-44%- Dark Red
45-49%- Red
Under 50% but Approval is higher than Disapproval- Pink
50-54%- Light Green
55-59%- Green
60%+- Dark Green

Let me know if you guys have any suggestions.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #337 on: December 26, 2009, 09:21:19 AM »
« Edited: December 26, 2009, 03:07:00 PM by RowanBrandon »




Ok, fixed the NY one(I had the right poll numbers, just put 7 in the wrong part of the code). I don't see why the Nevada has to change, it's in the 45-49% range so it's red.

Also, I have implemented a 6 month expiration date on polls. As a poll from June or July is not very indicative of where he is at this moment.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #338 on: December 26, 2009, 11:56:10 AM »

If I start doing averages, then Arizona goes to dark red as Rasmussen had a 40/60 poll of him there. I'd rather just stick with the latest poll, mainly because it's easier that way.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #339 on: December 27, 2009, 10:49:16 AM »


His maps are not fundamentally different to Rowan's.

I just like the Yellow-Green distinction better but prefer Rowan's numbering for the dates of the polls instead of the letters.

Let them create their own maps and everybody is happy.

I think they mean that he mixes favorability polls, excellent/good/fair/poor, and has used internal polls(Indiana is one IIRC).
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #340 on: December 29, 2009, 10:43:44 AM »

Nebraska(Rasmussen)

Approve 38%
Disapprove 61%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2012/nebraska/toplines/toplines_2012_nebraska_senate_election_december_28_2009



We finally get a Nebraska poll and it's no surprise.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #341 on: December 29, 2009, 05:31:28 PM »


Huh? Maryland is dark green.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #342 on: December 29, 2009, 05:48:55 PM »

A 38/61 Approval rating is actually good for Obama in Nebraska at this point.

How so? He won 42% there in 2008.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #343 on: December 29, 2009, 07:36:41 PM »

A 38/61 Approval rating is actually good for Obama in Nebraska at this point.

How so? He won 42% there in 2008.
He won by 53% nationwide. This means that Nebraska is R+11. Nebraska is only R+8(in theory) according to this approval rating because Obama is getting 46% nationwide currently according to Rassmussen.

Point is Obama still has a good chance of winning that Nebraska CD in 2012.

Good point. But sometimes Rasmussen's approvals are just a little out there, for example his 45% in South Carolina when he was 47% nationally.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #344 on: December 31, 2009, 12:12:47 PM »
« Edited: December 31, 2009, 12:18:13 PM by RowanBrandon »

New Hampshire(ARG)

Approve 39%
Disapprove 47%

http://americanresearchgroup.com/nhpoll/nhp04.html


Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #345 on: December 31, 2009, 12:26:53 PM »

Are we preferring likely voters over the total sample? Total sample was approve 40, disapprove 44, likely voters was 39-47. It's hard to tell how meaningful 'likely voters' is 10 months out, IMO.

It's registered voters. The total sample was 600 adults, broken down to 566 registered voters.
Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #346 on: December 31, 2009, 03:06:25 PM »

ARG = joke. Everyone seems to have forgot their wretched track record.

Actually they weren't that bad in 2008. Better than the RAS even:

Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #347 on: January 05, 2010, 10:43:04 AM »

Updated with Massachusetts.


Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #348 on: January 06, 2010, 12:50:08 PM »
« Edited: January 06, 2010, 01:30:55 PM by RowanBrandon »

Connecticut gets a little lighter.


Logged
Rowan
RowanBrandon
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,692


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 4.70

« Reply #349 on: January 06, 2010, 01:46:56 PM »

AR(Rasmussen)

Approve 38%
Disapprove 61%

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/arkansas/toplines/toplines_2010_arkansas_senate_race_january_5_2010

No change to the color, just the date.



Logged
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14] 15 16 17 18  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 13 queries.