Who is more trustworthy?

[Ljube]

Trump. No contest.

[Ljube]

Trump by far

I don't see how the many who has been proven to have lied on everything he's ever said is more trustworthy.

Cause those aren't really lies, unlike Clinton's calculated lies.

By the way, who has proven that Trump lied many times?

[Ljube]

per politifact, 52%of clinton's claims are true or mostly true, as compared to 15% of t***p's. there is an objectively correct answer here.

Quoting politifact, the Dem hack organization? You can't be serious.

[Ljube]

Trump by far

I don't see how the many who has been proven to have lied on everything he's ever said is more trustworthy.

Cause those aren't really lies, unlike Clinton's calculated lies.

By the way, who has proven that Trump lied many times?

He said that he saw Muslims cheering on 9/11. He said that he saw people asking for moments of silence for Micah Johnson. Those are just two of the grossest off the top of my head.

Are you sure he didn't see those two things?

[Ljube]

Trump by far

I don't see how the many who has been proven to have lied on everything he's ever said is more trustworthy.

Cause those aren't really lies, unlike Clinton's calculated lies.

By the way, who has proven that Trump lied many times?

He said that he saw Muslims cheering on 9/11. He said that he saw people asking for moments of silence for Micah Johnson. Those are just two of the grossest off the top of my head.

Are you sure he didn't see those two things?

Given that they didn't happen, yes.

How can you be so sure?

[Ljube]

Hillary Clinton may not mean what she says, but she at least knows what she actually means.

Donald Trump, on the other hand, may also not mean what she says, but it seems that he almost always doesn't know what he actually means, or what he is saying means, for that matter.

Which makes Trump more trustworthy.

[Ljube]

Ljube, You are sounding silly.
How is it possible that Little-Hands-Donny can see "thousands and thousands" of Muslims celebrating, but everyone else missed them ?

It has become very difficult to argue with you people from the position of reason. You seem to be too PC conditioned to be able to realize that it could be possible for Trump to see something which was not reported.

The media with a globalist agenda would never report a group of American Muslims cheering the 9/11 attack. Trump may have seen that in New Jersey, while visiting there.

Why do you think it is impossible for American Muslims to be celebrating an attack on America?

[Ljube]

Ljube, You are sounding silly.
How is it possible that Little-Hands-Donny can see "thousands and thousands" of Muslims celebrating, but everyone else missed them ?

It has become very difficult to argue with you people from the position of reason. You seem to be too PC conditioned to be able to realize that it could be possible for Trump to see something which was not reported.
The media with a globalist agenda would never report a group of American Muslims cheering the 9/11 attack. Trump may have seen that in New Jersey, while visiting there.
Why do you think it is impossible for American Muslims to be celebrating an attack on America?

Ljube,
You are sounding just as foolish trying to defend trump's "thousands and thousands" comment, as Seriously was trying to defend that Melania's words were not plagiarized from Michelle's speech.

PS: Your use of "PC conditioned" is so 1980's already. Move-on to something more modern.

Well, what can I say? I'm 42 years old.

[Ljube]

per politifact, 52%of clinton's claims are true or mostly true, as compared to 15% of t***p's. there is an objectively correct answer here.

Quoting politifact, the Dem hack organization? You can't be serious.

i am serious. unless you have a different source claiming the opposite, you should probably drop it, to avoid looking like (more of) an idiot. not that that seems to have ever been a concern of yours.

There is not a chance you could possibly omit an insult form a post of yours, of course.

[Ljube]

per politifact, 52%of clinton's claims are true or mostly true, as compared to 15% of t***p's. there is an objectively correct answer here.

Quoting politifact, the Dem hack organization? You can't be serious.

Ah, the true Trumpian way. When an organization calls you out on something or says you lie, attempt to delegitimatize them!

Why would I trust some organization with a not so hidden agenda?
If I want my facts checked, I'll check them myself.
I suggest you start doing the same. You will realize then how biased PolitiFact is.