Why Gingrich is Bad (and Romney is Awesome): A Politico Megathread Spectacular (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 06:41:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Why Gingrich is Bad (and Romney is Awesome): A Politico Megathread Spectacular (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which is the most absurd objective proposed by Newt Gingrich?
#1
Putting mirrors in outerspace to light highways
 
#2
Colonizing the moon for resources such as moon rocks
 
#3
Repealing child labor laws so children can spend time in school being janitors rather than learning
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 81

Author Topic: Why Gingrich is Bad (and Romney is Awesome): A Politico Megathread Spectacular  (Read 41300 times)
TheGlobalizer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

« on: January 21, 2012, 04:59:36 PM »

Troll thread.

That said, this:

This is a really, really disgusting thread. Tempted to hit the report button, but, I don't know. Perhaps we need proof of how low some will go and all that.

is also unnecessary.  Report for what?
Logged
TheGlobalizer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

« Reply #1 on: January 21, 2012, 05:23:18 PM »

A few things to say here.

This has been reported and I think it comes very close to crossing the line. I want to delete this. However, I guess there's a bit of precedent regarding politicians and psychiatric disorders, such as Thomas Eagleton, and Politico did cite legitimate news organizations here when asking his questions. However, this really should belong in the megathread; after all, it was created for a reason. I'd rather not see half of the front page devolve into a bunch of Politico threads again, with each one making one specific accusation.

Also, for the record, "manic depression" hasn't medically been a thing for 32 years now; the term was changed to "bipolar disorder" by the DSM III in 1980. If you're going to be making borderline-trollish accusations, at least get your facts right plz.

But yeah, moving this thread to the megathread.

Serious question, can you point me to some standard that is used on the board for acceptable discourse, or is this a "you know it when you see it" pornography definition?
Logged
TheGlobalizer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

« Reply #2 on: January 21, 2012, 05:42:07 PM »

A few things to say here.

This has been reported and I think it comes very close to crossing the line. I want to delete this. However, I guess there's a bit of precedent regarding politicians and psychiatric disorders, such as Thomas Eagleton, and Politico did cite legitimate news organizations here when asking his questions. However, this really should belong in the megathread; after all, it was created for a reason. I'd rather not see half of the front page devolve into a bunch of Politico threads again, with each one making one specific accusation.

Also, for the record, "manic depression" hasn't medically been a thing for 32 years now; the term was changed to "bipolar disorder" by the DSM III in 1980. If you're going to be making borderline-trollish accusations, at least get your facts right plz.

But yeah, moving this thread to the megathread.

Serious question, can you point me to some standard that is used on the board for acceptable discourse, or is this a "you know it when you see it" pornography definition?

"You know it when you see it"; different mods have different standards, but I usually try to err on the side of leniency unless something is way over the line.

Fair enough.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.