2000 without Lewinsky (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 04:46:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  2000 without Lewinsky (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2000 without Lewinsky  (Read 759 times)
Alben Barkley
KYWildman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,343
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.74

P P
« on: May 18, 2019, 10:40:07 PM »

Gore wins. But not because voters actually cared about Lewinsky, but rather because Gore wouldn't mistakenly believe they did. He wouldn't hesitate to campaign extensively with Clinton and tie himself heavily to Clinton, running for a "third term" essentially of the extremely popular president with a booming economy, much like Bush in '88.

Granted, there may have been a couple of states (including perhaps Gore's home state of Tennessee as well as Clinton's home state of Arkansas) where enough social/religious conservatives were in fact turned off by Clinton's behavior that it could make a difference there by itself.

But regardless, Gore wins easily. Even with all the mistakes in his campaign, he still won "lost" by like 200 votes.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.