UK General Discussion: Rishecession (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 07:05:00 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK General Discussion: Rishecession (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Author Topic: UK General Discussion: Rishecession  (Read 256930 times)
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,634


« Reply #125 on: March 28, 2024, 09:43:34 AM »

Without meaning to suggest that Preston is the eighth wonder of the world, train stations and their environs are famously poor indicators of the wealth of a town.
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,634


« Reply #126 on: March 29, 2024, 10:38:50 AM »

By-election imminent in Lagan Valley?

Probably not. You can continue to serve as an MP whilst charged with a criminal offence and the seat is only considered to be vacated if a sentence of more than 12 months imprisonment is passed. In practice, if the case proceeds to trial there is no way it will be held before the end of the year.

So the only reasons to resign would be if Donaldson chose to or if the DUP pressured him to do so. I do not think a by-election which would probably focus on the reasons for the resignation would be somethingthe DUP would look forward to, so they're probably not going to pressure him to do so.

However, given the likelihood that criminal proceedings will be in preparation at the next general election, it's probable that the DUP will select a new candidate for the seat.
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,634


« Reply #127 on: April 10, 2024, 08:09:54 AM »

Harwood is also young and transphobia has much less purchase amongst younger generations, for whom young people transitioning isn't a "the children are wrong" issue but a thing that affects some members of their generation.
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,634


« Reply #128 on: April 25, 2024, 04:21:49 AM »

What would have been the mechanism for the SNP membership to vote? They didn't have a vote on the initial agreement and Yousaf was opposed to them having a vote now.

If the Green membership had rejected the agreement that would certainly have hurt Yousaf, but I'm not convinced that publicly burning his bridges with the Greens having just been defending them is a better option, particularly as it makes him look dependent on the right of his party. He had a difficult hand but this looks like a poor way to play it.
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,634


« Reply #129 on: April 26, 2024, 03:43:24 AM »

A lot of the Green anger is clearly towards Yousaf specifically - otherwise it seems unlikely there would have been an unanimous decision to vote No Confidence (assuming this is true.) It's possible another SNP leader could convince them to think again, but there would probably have to be a policy concession to sweeten the deal.

And I presume that in the interim the new leader would have to be Keith Brown as Depute Leader. Whether he would want to do that long-term, if he'd face a leadership challenge and how SNP members would break in that hypothetical contest are all different questions.

I'd add that even if Yousaf does survive this, the SNP constitution appears to allow for annual elections. I would assume that this whole affair has damaged his credibility enough that somebody (Forbes?) will try to take a run at him over the summer.
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,634


« Reply #130 on: April 26, 2024, 05:43:27 AM »

Albeit that that is somewhat dependent on the result of the next Westminster election and which SNP parliamentarians find themselves on the hunt for a seat. Most of the SNP talent is at Holyrood, but there are a couple of Westminster figures who would presumably do respectably in a leadership contest and some of them are in seats that are at least somewhat vulnerable.
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,634


« Reply #131 on: April 26, 2024, 07:45:18 AM »

Regan has announced she'll be voting against the VoNC in the government as a whole. Not a massive surprise, but makes a snap election less likely.
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,634


« Reply #132 on: May 13, 2024, 10:06:16 AM »

Ordinarily that sort of briefing would mean that the Conservative Whips Office is either a) feeling paranoid and has decided to spook any would-be jumper into getting cold feet or that b) it has been yelled at by a paranoid No. 10 and is therefore doing the same as a) in order to stop the shouting. I say 'ordinarily' as they've really not been good at even the basics of their jobs for quite a while now.

There is of course the alternative possibility, that their own MPs respect the whips so little that they're threatening to defect just to mess with them.
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,634


« Reply #133 on: May 14, 2024, 04:22:22 PM »

In the unlikely event it is a defection, there's every chance it's not even an Essex-based MP and that that's just a piece of misdirection.
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,634


« Reply #134 on: May 15, 2024, 04:24:34 AM »

Labour are telling journalists not to expect a defection, FWIW.
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,634


« Reply #135 on: May 15, 2024, 05:14:17 AM »

May has also confirmed she's definitely not defecting.
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,634


« Reply #136 on: May 20, 2024, 04:19:35 AM »

Providing jobs and supporting regional economies being, of course, entirely socially useless things.
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,634


« Reply #137 on: May 20, 2024, 06:57:36 AM »

Higher education, although a lot of the things the government are most negative about (eg foundation years) are functionally a bit of both.
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,634


« Reply #138 on: May 23, 2024, 03:09:54 PM »

The committee has two Tories, two SNP and a Labour chair. On the one hand, one of the Tories had commented on Matheson's case before it came up, which is a conflict of interest (and incidentally, she has previously been suspended.) On the other hand, the SNP members seem to have voted against any sanction, so the chair gave as his reason for voting in favour that there needed to be at least some sanction.

In conclusion, it's a mess but what Swinney is doing makes no political sense.
Logged
EastAnglianLefty
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,634


« Reply #139 on: May 24, 2024, 05:15:26 AM »

Is Greater Manchester Police also going to be affected by purdah?
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 12 queries.