Why was Colorado still looked at as a swing state/competitive in 2016? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 06:51:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Why was Colorado still looked at as a swing state/competitive in 2016? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Why was Colorado still looked at as a swing state/competitive in 2016?  (Read 565 times)
It’s so Joever
Forumlurker161
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,042


« on: July 28, 2023, 12:34:58 PM »

As late as 2016 the Republicans won the popular vote for the Colorado legislature, and they did so pretty comfortably in 2014, along with multiple statewide offices. (Only Governor and Senator were actually particularly closely contested that year). Under the 2012/2014-era trends, if anything it seemed to be trending back to the right.

Colorado, which is really rapidly becoming a more-educated state, has some kind of weird and unique dynamics; its state constitution, which includes TABOR, forces it to be significantly more 'fiscally conservative' than most state governments, and it has a pretty moderate set of leading Democrats for such a Democratic state. It's also very vulnerable to trends among college-educated voters, and has persistently high third-party totals.
TABOR and the Gallagher amendment was the bane of our existence when I was in a youth policy group back in high school. They seriously screw up basic funding. One down, hopefully the monstrosity that is TABOR falls soon.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 10 queries.