Gore won in 2000... (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 12:57:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results
  2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Gore won in 2000... (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Gore won in 2000...  (Read 10059 times)
elcorazon
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,402


« on: June 10, 2004, 10:21:44 AM »

this is the most ridiculous thread ever.  Gore doesn't deserve to be president because he lost more states/counties, won by wide margins in certain areas.  As opebo correctly pointed out, the converse is also true.  Bush won in rural areas; he would not care about cities I guess, by your logic.  Which is more significant to the country, the cities (and areas around the cities) where the majority live, or the rural areas where people are more sparse?  

Yes, I know how the electoral college works, and how the popular vote is different, but jeez, the logic in this thread is truly inane.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 12 queries.