WHO SHOULD BE VP ?!?

[zachman]

I voted for Evan Bayh, it would secure the midwest, and carry Ohio and maybe Indiana for the Dems.

You forgot to put John Edwards, who I would also be very satisfied with.

[zachman]

      Edwards would be a good pick for several reasons. First, he is a rising star, picking him sets up a strong candidate for future elections. He is a smart national choice, giving dems a solid boost everywhere. He would put NC into play, and the swing southern states of Arkansas, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Florida would also come into play.

[zachman]

Graham is a fading star, and should not get the nomination in the future. Kerry needs to pick a VP who could become a strong nominee in the future, Nelson is better for this.

[zachman]

Graham has minimal charisma, the democrats are going to pick someone who helps them nationally, and is a good compliment well balanced crudentials.  After learning from 2000, the dems. choice will be selected to be the next rising star, and to have little risk involved.

[zachman]

Would Edwards get picked if he smoothly fades out of the presidential election, the way Clark has?

[zachman]

You put Ted Kennedy on the ballot?!?! That's unconstitutional.

[zachman]

If Dean picked Kennedy he'd run into the establishment problem he ran into with Gore. But that won't happen.

WHy do you republicans hate Dean so much? Is it what he says? Is it his supporters?

[zachman]

you're 16 Gustaf!!!!! Wow you know a lot about American elections.

I'm still the youngest one at the post at 15!!!

Its great that you are an Edwards supporter hockey dude, I am too, but he hasn't finished so hot recently. For his political career to continue, he can't get dragged to the ground by Kerry. He was looking so strong last Tuesday from 7:00-8:00 PM.

[zachman]

When was the attitude that Dean was unelectable form? Is it because he is fearless? Is it because he is loud about Bush?