PiT v Xahar (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 20, 2024, 08:28:25 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community
  Forum Community Election Match-ups (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  PiT v Xahar (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Battle of the young NoCal radicals
#1
PiT/PiT
 
#2
PiT/Xahar
 
#3
Xahar/Xahar
 
#4
Xahar/PiT
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 36

Author Topic: PiT v Xahar  (Read 4589 times)
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,664
United States


« on: October 21, 2008, 12:31:19 AM »

Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,664
United States


« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2008, 02:23:47 AM »

Social safety net means that when something happens to people they can get help. For example if someone is old and they get there house taken away by a flood, then the gov would help them survie during the duration. But if you are in a libertarian country they would not help you. for examlpe if you are a libritarian and the big comanies are going bankrupt then they have to bailthemselfs out instead of the gov. 
do you get it?
Does this mythological libertarian country ban the Red Cross and other private organizations designed to help people during times of need?  That doesn't sound very libertarian.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,664
United States


« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2008, 04:44:22 AM »

Social safety net means that when something happens to people they can get help. For example if someone is old and they get there house taken away by a flood, then the gov would help them survie during the duration. But if you are in a libertarian country they would not help you. for examlpe if you are a libritarian and the big comanies are going bankrupt then they have to bailthemselfs out instead of the gov. 
do you get it?
Does this mythological libertarian country ban the Red Cross and other private organizations designed to help people during times of need?  That doesn't sound very libertarian.

Why would it, Libertarians do'nt mind unless it hurts someone directly.
My point being that there are many organizations that do a LOT better job in emergencies than the Feds do.  If there was no Fed doing these kinds of things, these organizations would be bigger and there would be more of them and they would still do a good job.  The Federal Govt isn't the only institution that can provide assistance in times of trouble, in fact, they tend to muck things up when they get their dick in the pie.  (as they do with most everything they touch)
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,664
United States


« Reply #3 on: November 22, 2008, 02:58:46 AM »

Somebody says that every 4 years.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,664
United States


« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2008, 07:34:36 AM »

Yep, that's how it usually works.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 15 queries.