Gun Nuts vs. Anti-Gun Nuts: Who is worse? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 29, 2024, 07:04:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Gun Nuts vs. Anti-Gun Nuts: Who is worse? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who is worse?
#1
Gun Nuts
 
#2
Anti-Gun Nuts
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 92

Author Topic: Gun Nuts vs. Anti-Gun Nuts: Who is worse?  (Read 4314 times)
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


« on: April 01, 2014, 10:16:59 AM »

A bit of cash and the chore of cancelling your credit cards is not worth shooting someone or escalating a situation like that.  But, I suppose the only real self-defense is common-sense and that gun nuts do not have.

I am not going to give the money I earned working in a Capitalist society to a criminal, a tyrant, a person unworthy of life. Do you realize that you are defending the criminal? The criminal made their bed and now they have to sleep in it. If that means that a legally armed good hearted citizen puts a bullet through the skull of a criminal who is robbing, attacking, or hurting the innocent...that's the end of story. Period. Don't you dare defend the criminals. Because then you become just like them. You're either with us or against us. There is no gray area. Period.

This is, by far, a great example of how sissy, girlie, whiny, defeatist and naive liberals are. This is a prime example as to why no matter what a so-called "wacko" conservative might say, no matter how rich a Republican is, no matter how old or how white or how close minded they are, I can never vote for a liberal. I can not vote for sissy, cowards. Weaklings.

Your mentality, had it been the ruling majority in the 1940s, would have meant that if people like you had your way, we would have had no guns, wouldn't have involved ourselves in World War II and would never have tested terrible scary weapons. You know who would have? The Third Reich, and they would have won that war because of defeatists like you.

It's the cowardly thought process that you possess and show in full true to form colors in this thread that makes the world a dangerous place. How dare you smear garbage like that. In this country. A country founded by men rising up with guns against a burdening King. You want them taken away?

This is why I vote for cowboys and war heroes, not sissy liberals, professors and draft dodgers with ugly wives.

Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2014, 10:26:30 AM »

A bit of cash and the chore of cancelling your credit cards is not worth shooting someone or escalating a situation like that.  But, I suppose the only real self-defense is common-sense and that gun nuts do not have.

I am not going to give the money I earned working in a Capitalist society to a criminal, a tyrant, a person unworthy of life. Do you realize that you are defending the criminal? The criminal made their bed and now they have to sleep in it. If that means that a legally armed good hearted citizen puts a bullet through the skull of a criminal who is robbing, attacking, or hurting the innocent...that's the end of story. Period. Don't you dare defend the criminals. Because then you become just like them. You're either with us or against us. There is no gray area. Period.

This is, by far, a great example of how sissy, girlie, whiny, defeatist and naive liberals are. This is a prime example as to why no matter what a so-called "wacko" conservative might say, no matter how rich a Republican is, no matter how old or how white or how close minded they are, I can never vote for a liberal. I can not vote for sissy, cowards. Weaklings.

Your mentality, had it been the ruling majority in the 1940s, would have meant that if people like you had your way, we would have had no guns, wouldn't have involved ourselves in World War II and would never have tested terrible scary weapons. You know who would have? The Third Reich, and they would have won that war because of defeatists like you.

It's the cowardly thought process that you possess and show in full true to form colors in this thread that makes the world a dangerous place. How dare you smear garbage like that. In this country. A country founded by men rising up with guns against a burdening King. You want them taken away?

This is why I vote for cowboys and war heroes, not sissy liberals, professors and draft dodgers with ugly wives.



Conservative women are uglier than liberal women...

I don't mean this in a derogatory way and this isn't a direct personal attack, but how does it feel to be a man, and yet have such cowardly opinions?
Logged
Reaganfan
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,236
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2014, 10:54:01 AM »

The difference between petty muggers and Hitler is so stark in degree as to amount to a difference in kind, and if you sincerely don't recognize or accept that then I fear for your ability to navigate any situation in life that can't be dealt with through intimidating or impressing people with shallow canards and macho posturing. If that's supposed to be what it means to 'be a man' then I'd rather be castrated.

You're missing my point.

Man walks down the street and is attacked by a guy. I feel sympathy for the man and want a harsh punishment for the attacker.

Man walks down the street to buy Meth and is attacked by the guy. The attacker still deserves harsh punishment, but the man dealing in drugs is no longer innocent, thus the sympathy is gone.

See?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 11 queries.