TX: 2005 Referendum Special Election Result (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 12:31:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  TX: 2005 Referendum Special Election Result (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: TX: 2005 Referendum Special Election Result  (Read 6587 times)
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


« on: September 27, 2009, 07:39:36 AM »

Here's the Virginia referendum (same language as the Ohio one) to compare (57-43 statewide for yes):



The "No" areas are obvious -- cosmopolitan NoVa, heavily Democratic Richmond, Norfolk, and Petersburg, and college towns Williamsburg (William & Mary), Lexington (Washington & Lee), Charlottesville/Albemarle County (UVA), and Fredericksburg (Mary Washington). Montgomery County (Virginia Tech) was close, too (52-48 for yes). I'm also surprised that Lynchburg was only 52.3 - 47.7 yes.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2009, 08:36:55 AM »

Is it surprising that Virginia didn't get ~70% yes like all other southern states?

Virginia's referendum banned same-sex marriage, civil unions, and anything else that simulates the appearance of marriage. It was basically a carbon copy of the Ohio law. And the law is so strict that it has unintended consequences: one of the problems is enforcing domestic violence statutes in relation to unmarried heterosexual couples -- there have been cases in Ohio thrown out because the defense has successfully argued the marriage amendment prevents them from being prosecuted like a spouse would.

An amendment that just said "marriage is between a man and a woman" would have easily passed with 70% of the vote, but this was so controversial, even the right-wing Richmond Times-Dispatch endorsed the "no" position. (As a comparison, they were the only daily paper in Virginia to endorse Jim Gilmore over Mark Warner.)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 11 queries.