S019 vs Ferguson97 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 01:29:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Forum Community
  Forum Community
  Forum Community Election Match-ups (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, YE, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  S019 vs Ferguson97 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who would you vote for
#1
S019(R)
 
#2
Ferguson97(R)
 
#3
S019(D)
 
#4
Ferguson97(D)
 
#5
S019(I/O)
 
#6
Ferguson97(I/O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 52

Author Topic: S019 vs Ferguson97  (Read 1390 times)
S019
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,392
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -1.39

P P P

« on: January 08, 2024, 02:15:45 AM »
« edited: January 08, 2024, 02:20:48 AM by S019 »

Pretty disappointing that so many users voted for the type of person who thinks you should need an occupational license to assemble Ikea furniture.

Can people stop acting like his views from 2019-20 are still his views today . S019 is far more moderate on economic, social issues than Ferguson and it’s not even remotely close .  His foreign policy is way better as well .

S019 politically is basically Micheal Bloomberg while Ferguson is Elizabeth Warren


Your comparison is crap as usual. S019 is functionally a totalitarian, and even if he were comparable to Bloomberg, I still prefer Warren. Stop embarrassing yourself trying to defend the type of person who thinks office swivel chairs should come with seatbelts.

*Yawn*

I mean I don't know why it's even worth my time to engage with these strawmen you made up in your head. Point me to one time where I ever said office chairs come with seatbelts or shut up. I'm sick and tired of your obnoxious attitudes on this topic.

As for my actual views, they're hard to describe but I'd say generally they're liberal which means in favor of free-market economics and generally socially liberal (though I have some conservative streaks on moral issues). Dumb kids saying dumb things isn't totalitarian. I mean I do think the government has to serve some role to protect the people, but it can obviously do this without regulating swivel chairs or IKEA Cabinets. However I don't think it's necessarily authoritarian to think governments should be allowed to access cell phones of terrorists or that gateway drugs should not be allowed to spread in schools and get innocent high schoolers addicted.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.