Should the DNC replace Harris with another running mate? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 07:59:27 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  2024 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, GeorgiaModerate, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  Should the DNC replace Harris with another running mate? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should the DNC replace Harris with another running mate?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 73

Author Topic: Should the DNC replace Harris with another running mate?  (Read 1098 times)
Anti-Trump Truth Socialite JD Vance Enjoying Juror
NYDem
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,255
United States Minor Outlying Islands


« on: May 05, 2024, 09:50:25 AM »

Biden is not dropping out and was never going to drop out. Here's another helpful list of things which will not happen, which I'm sure Atlasians will nonetheless discuss as though they are real possibilities:

A contested convention
A cancelled/virtual convention
Replacing the incumbent VP
A third party candidate winning a state
A House contingent election (This is probably the most likely of the bunch. It still will not happen.)

The last time a VP was replaced for re-election to a second term was in the late 1800s. It is not going to happen. Every time somebody suggests replacing the VP as if it’s a realistic possibility, a puppy dies.
Logged
Anti-Trump Truth Socialite JD Vance Enjoying Juror
NYDem
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,255
United States Minor Outlying Islands


« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2024, 03:01:05 PM »
« Edited: May 06, 2024, 03:55:58 PM by ꙮ »

Biden is not dropping out and was never going to drop out. Here's another helpful list of things which will not happen, which I'm sure Atlasians will nonetheless discuss as though they are real possibilities:

A contested convention
A cancelled/virtual convention
Replacing the incumbent VP
A third party candidate winning a state
A House contingent election (This is probably the most likely of the bunch. It still will not happen.)

The last time a VP was replaced for re-election to a second term was in the late 1800s. It is not going to happen. Every time somebody suggests replacing the VP as if it’s a realistic possibility, a puppy dies.

What a cute phrasing of things to remove the 3 times the VP was replaced in this past century.

1976 - Nelson Rockefeller removed and replaced with Bob Dole
1940 - John Nance Garner removed and replaced with Henry Wallace (if you want to say Garner was not removed insofar as he ran for President himself, fine, that still leaves...
1944 - Henry Wallace removed and replaced with Harry Truman

It was also privately discussed in 2004 and possibly replacing Dick Cheney.

It’s not “cute phrasing” to not count Rockefeller. He was the 25th amendment replacement VP to a replacement president. He was never on a ticket in the first place. He was an obvious placeholder pick.

Admittedly FDR is a more reasonable objection, but even then only 1944 counts. Garner clearly had no interest in remaining VP given he ran against Roosevelt, as you point out.

Wallace->Truman is the only VP replacement that really counts, "cute phrasing" aside.


I don’t believe for a second that there was actually a chance of Cheney being removed in 2004. People have allegedly “privately discussed” replacing every VP, but it never actually happens. The last time it was even a serious possibility (excluding the previously mentioned Agnew->Ford->Rockefeller->Dole shuffle 72-76) was Nixon in 56.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 10 queries.