Voter suppresion/"stealing the election" megathread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 04:10:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Voter suppresion/"stealing the election" megathread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Voter suppresion/"stealing the election" megathread  (Read 145278 times)
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,060


« on: October 13, 2020, 05:42:23 AM »

What is even the justification for this? These judges are absolute hacks.

Letter of the law + one Dropbox is better than zero. Equal protection, huh, never heard of it.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,060


« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2020, 05:52:11 AM »

Texas limits by-mail early voting to:
   (1) Those over 65.
   (2) Those with disabilities.
   (3) Those who are incarcerated (non-felons awaiting trial in jail)
   (4) Those who will be outside the county for the entire early-voting period.

I'm actually way more mad about the 5th Circuit's (and I think at least one other circuit's) ruling on that. Drop boxes are at least debatable but that's a blatant violation of the plain text of the Constitution. The 26th Amendment was worded identically to the 15th Amendment, so it demands the same level of scrutiny that would be given to an explicit whites-only absentee voting law. (Though maybe I shouldn't expect that the court would stop that either.)
Texas has never had "drop boxes". A mail voter could take their ballot to the county clerk on election day, and after showing an ID, could hand deliver it. Most voters, like, mailed their mail ballot.

You'd think that if someone thought that the 26th Amendment was applicable, they would have filed suit in the past 48 years. I'm pretty sure someone would have filed suit against a mail ballot for whites-only before 1913, or a male-only mail (male?) ballot before 1968.

Texas could simply eliminate the dispensation for those over 65. Many elderly have mobility or other disabilities.


Perhaps this being the first election in a mass pandemic is a factor, Jim.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,060


« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2020, 06:01:04 AM »

LOL, Charlie Kirk was suspended from Twitter for lying about the Pennsylvania issue as being about duplicate ballots, not ballot requests.

He elides terms like this all the time to stir up outrage, but now it’s too close to the election for Twitter to tolerate his shenanigans.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,060


« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2020, 10:37:19 AM »

That’s all well and good but preventing GSA from signing off on a transition makes this a serious real decision and not theater.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.