538 model & poll tracker thread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2024, 11:33:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  538 model & poll tracker thread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 538 model & poll tracker thread  (Read 58145 times)
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,028


« on: August 12, 2020, 10:41:43 AM »

This seems pretty accurate, I don’t know why Atlas is so upset.

7% chance of Biden winning AR. 13% chance in MS. Let that settle in.

That’s because of the crazy uncertainty around COVID and economic collapse, right? I don’t really believe he’s right, but I can see someone saying “there’s a 13% chance that current conditions are experienced as such a break from normality that big chunks of the Republican base don’t show up.” I wouldn’t bet on it, but it’s not crazy.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,028


« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2020, 09:07:20 PM »



This is just embarrassing.

40,000 simulations or not, this shouldn't show up if you do 40,000,000 simulations.

Titanium Tilt R Florida and "Just Not There Yet" Georgia.
Titanium R Oregon. Fivey Fox took drugs again.

That one poll showing Oregon as a 12-point gap has polluted the data.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,028


« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2020, 06:36:34 PM »

Right now Biden and Cornyn have equal odds of winning - 87%.

Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,028


« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2020, 04:27:26 PM »

I'm a bit confused how Biden is only leading by 8.8 in the aggregate after today's polls.

Previous CNN poll was an even bigger margin than today's.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,028


« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2020, 09:10:58 AM »

So here's some weirdness from the negative state correlations side of things:

If Biden wins Georgia and North Carolina, he has a 16% chance of winning Mississippi.

If Biden wins Georgia, North Carolina, and Minnesota, he still has a 16% chance of winning Mississippi.

However, if Biden wins Georgia and North Carolina, but loses Minnesota, he suddenly has a 53% chance of winning Mississippi.

This one actually kind of makes sense — if Biden’s winning GA and NC but losing MN, something must have turbocharged black turnout nationwide.

Also, isn’t there a latitude factor in the model?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.03 seconds with 13 queries.