States with large swings that were not widely expected (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 27, 2024, 05:05:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  States with large swings that were not widely expected (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: States with large swings that were not widely expected  (Read 1526 times)
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


« on: November 30, 2019, 11:16:16 AM »

I'm curious, what are some states that had large swings that were not generally expected prior to the election? IN in 2008 and MI in 2016 come to mind, but what are some other examples, recent or not?
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2019, 12:04:05 PM »
« Edited: December 01, 2019, 05:37:51 PM by Orser67 »

Looking at some old Sabato articles, the biggest one they got wrong on election day in 2016 was calling WI Likely D (whereas PA and MI were Lean D). They also labeled a bunch of Trump states as Lean D, though it's worth noting that they didn't use the Tossup or Tilt categories.

They got all but two states right in 2012: they wrongly predicted FL and VA(!) would go for Romney, having both as Lean R (and they specifically noted that VA was really a complete tossup, alongside Colorado and New Hampshire).

They got all but two things right in 2008: they wrongly said that McCain would win NE-2 and Indiana. But credit to them for this statement: "If Barack Obama wins the popular vote by 7 or 8 percentage points, then he will also carry at least a couple of the following states: Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Montana, North Dakota."

In 2004, they got two states wrong: they called Florida for Democrats, and Wisconsin for Republicans, but in both cases they stated that their confidence was "low".

So for Sabato for these elections, it seems like the two biggest surprises were WI in 2016 and IN in 2008.
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946
United States


« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2019, 12:45:24 AM »

MI in 2016 was much more of a shock, as was the size of the swing in some of the northern Plains states like IA and ND. Conversely, most didn't expect CA to swing as much to Clinton.

Yeah, other than MI, IA might have had the most surprising swing of 2016. Most prognosticators expected Trump to win the state, but the size of his victory was surprising given that it had given Obama 5 and 10 point victories.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 12 queries.