Do you think this country would be better off without suburbs? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 12:45:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Do you think this country would be better off without suburbs? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you think this country would be better off without suburbs?
#1
Yes (R)
 
#2
No (R)
 
#3
Yes (D)
 
#4
No (D)
 
#5
Yes (I/Third Party)
 
#6
No (I/Third Party)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 60

Author Topic: Do you think this country would be better off without suburbs?  (Read 8672 times)
NDN
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,495
Uganda


« on: September 24, 2007, 07:31:13 PM »

Of course we'd be better off. Suburbia isn't a bad place to live, but the sort of lifestyle it represents is not sustainable in the least. Suburban "homes" overall are an incredibly inefficient use of land and resources. The only reason suburban life became "standard" in the first place in this country was because of unprecedented government subsidization plus cheap abundant gas. As gas prices increase, it will become increasingly uneconomical for people to live so far away from work, real commercial centers (not just the mall), etc. The government needs to start encouraging people to move to the cities (instead of basically encouraging suburban blight). Or at least utilize their neighborhoods much better than they do now.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.