New Hampshire Primary Thread (polls close at 6-7 CT) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2024, 12:43:36 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  New Hampshire Primary Thread (polls close at 6-7 CT) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: New Hampshire Primary Thread (polls close at 6-7 CT)  (Read 54016 times)
GALeftist
sansymcsansface
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,748


Political Matrix
E: -7.29, S: -9.48

P
« on: February 11, 2020, 10:11:30 PM »

There's been a lot of talk about what a disastrous underperformance this is for Bernie, but it's not really. He's at 26% with 73% in, so if he ends up getting that then he underperformed his polling average by a point, maybe 2 or 3 if you're generous. The real story here is that the race isn't as fractured as polling would have indicated. From a cursory glance, it seems as though a fair portion of Warren and Biden supporters broke towards Klobuchar and Buttigieg, along with undecideds breaking disproportionately for those candidates (especially Klobuchar I guess). What does this mean for the rest of the primary? I don't know, maybe it's just a weird New Hampshire thing or maybe the divided field really isn't as divided as we think.

Side note but some of these results are really weird. How does Pittsburg have 19% voting for Tulsi?
Logged
GALeftist
sansymcsansface
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,748


Political Matrix
E: -7.29, S: -9.48

P
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2020, 10:22:55 PM »

Klobuchar has taken a lot of votes from Warren too along with Biden votes. I don't think people even care about ideology anymore.

Yeah what in the world. I guess Atlas is kind of a bubble but how are voters making these nonsensical evaluations of second choices
Logged
GALeftist
sansymcsansface
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,748


Political Matrix
E: -7.29, S: -9.48

P
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2020, 10:29:27 PM »

78% reporting and Sanders is starting to lead by more than 2% again. Not familiar enough with NH demographics to say for sure if this trend will continue
Logged
GALeftist
sansymcsansface
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,748


Political Matrix
E: -7.29, S: -9.48

P
« Reply #3 on: February 11, 2020, 10:40:13 PM »

So probably a Sanders win, but narrower than his camp might have liked. How does this play out in terms of the media narrative? Unlike Iowa, the narrative won't be about the mismanagement of the primary. Will it be just straight "Bernie Wins"? "Buttigieg almost wins"? "Klobuchar surges"? "Warren and Biden collapse"? Really any of these narratives could create dramatically different environments heading into Nevada
Logged
GALeftist
sansymcsansface
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,748


Political Matrix
E: -7.29, S: -9.48

P
« Reply #4 on: February 11, 2020, 10:42:20 PM »

This also exposes a lot of Sanders's 2016 support as a reaction against Clinton, which might be relevant to remember as the campaign heads into areas like Appalachia and the Midwest
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 10 queries.