Congressional Special Election (last call! unstickied after NY-27 final results) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 06:21:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Congressional Special Election (last call! unstickied after NY-27 final results) (search mode)
Thread note

Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Congressional Special Election (last call! unstickied after NY-27 final results)  (Read 170709 times)
President Phil Scott
marco.rem451
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 344


« on: December 01, 2018, 10:44:29 AM »

Can someone provide the Cliffs Notes version of jim's post?

Pretty much.   A black Democrat goes door to door with sample ballots, take the people's ballots to the poll.   Democrats have been harvesting votes for decades, Republicans never do anything wrong....yadda yadda yadda.

Thank you for summarizing.
.
Logged
President Phil Scott
marco.rem451
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 344


« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2018, 07:28:14 PM »

Democrats are trying to steal another Congressional Race. They always do.
yep. the nonpartisan election(with 4-5 pubs on it) board that voted unanimously to do an investigation is trying to steal this race for dems.

Un related, but what's that Ernst map in your sig?
Logged
President Phil Scott
marco.rem451
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 344


« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2018, 08:07:57 PM »

So what's happened while i was mandated to be gone and took a little bit of a rest here? Haven't caught up on all the news yet. Any conclusive evidence of fraid, un the meantime?
Logged
President Phil Scott
marco.rem451
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 344


« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2018, 08:16:05 PM »

Democrats are trying to steal another Congressional Race. They always do.
yep. the nonpartisan election(with 4-5 pubs on it) board that voted unanimously to do an investigation is trying to steal this race for dems.

Un related, but what's that Ernst map in your sig?

her 2020 map.

Wouldn't have guess you were a fan!
Logged
President Phil Scott
marco.rem451
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 344


« Reply #4 on: December 03, 2018, 10:50:44 PM »

So in theory could democrats just refuse to seat every republican in the house just cuz?

In therory, lol ... in theory, YES.
Logged
President Phil Scott
marco.rem451
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 344


« Reply #5 on: December 03, 2018, 10:54:39 PM »

And I think so long as McCready is unable to catch up, Harris should be certified regardless of fraud. An insurmountable race ought to lead to certification.

That's not how this works. Any fraud committed in an election should nullify it regardless of if the candidate trailing can catch up.

no lol
If it is proven the fraud was limited and Harris was not involved then it should be certified. A special election is a waste of money in that scenario and also a middle finger to the other Harris voters and the plurality of voters who wanted Harris.

There is nothing funny about this. You are implying that it's okay to commit fraud if it doesn't effect the result or if the candidate didn't know about it (which seems hard to believe). If voters had their ballots forged or destroyed then they should be given the opportunity to vote in a fair election.

I don't think that's what he meant.

But indeed, if we wend up discovering out that the outcome itself won't possibly be changed whether or not the fraud occurred, yet couldn't have swing the outcome, then Harris deserves to be declared the winner.

That is, of course, not to say that no investigations should be opened, in the name of security transparency and simple safety's sake, one (or maybe multiple) certainly should.

And those involved must definitely be held responsible according to the law. Obviously if Harris turns out to have played a part then he will deserve to be prosecuted and the consequences I imagine will be serious (not just removal from the chamber)
Logged
President Phil Scott
marco.rem451
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 344


« Reply #6 on: December 04, 2018, 06:04:40 PM »



Richard Burr jumps on the "redo the election" bandwagon.

Shame, I expected better from him.

Well then now, like- I do mean...
Logged
President Phil Scott
marco.rem451
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 344


« Reply #7 on: December 05, 2018, 04:33:16 PM »

Does this mean that the voter fraud in California will also be investigated?

Actually people are being investigated and charged:

https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-skid-row-voter-fraud-20181120-story.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Seems like this was mostly petition-related because they were being paid per-petition and rates had skyrocketed due to the # of initiatives. So it's not really the same, and not as interesting.

-

HOWEVER, if you want to talk about this, make another thread. This isn't a fraud megathread. It's specifically about North Carolina / NC-09. I will split off conversations about this if they balloon in size. Whatboutism isn't relevant to this thread.

Exactly.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.038 seconds with 12 queries.