MO Gov Galloway in (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 08:23:18 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  MO Gov Galloway in (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MO Gov Galloway in  (Read 11134 times)
Flyersfan232
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,928


« on: September 19, 2019, 07:43:35 PM »

She will do around what McCaskill did.

She will likely do worse

1. 2020 likely won’t be a D+9 year
2. Contrary to McCaskill, Galloway won’t have $40M to spend
3. Parson is a popular incumbent
4. Running on abortion is not a winning issue in MO
5. Trump will likely carry this state by +15 and will provide coattails to other conservative candidates

It is dumb to campaign solely on abortion in  Missouri but even Mississippi rejected a life at conception amendment, Considering Missouri is more liberal than MS going against hardcore abortion bans can work.

It worked pretty well for Wendy Davis....

Are we talking about the same Missouri that re-elected Claire McCaskill by 16% because of her oponent’s extreme stance on abortion?
The same Missouri that threw her out 6 year later to a guy endorse by a man that said grab them by he pussy?
Logged
Flyersfan232
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,928


« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2019, 07:46:36 PM »

She will do around what McCaskill did.

She will likely do worse

1. 2020 likely won’t be a D+9 year
2. Contrary to McCaskill, Galloway won’t have $40M to spend
3. Parson is a popular incumbent
4. Running on abortion is not a winning issue in MO
5. Trump will likely carry this state by +15 and will provide coattails to other conservative candidates

It is dumb to campaign solely on abortion in  Missouri but even Mississippi rejected a life at conception amendment, Considering Missouri is more liberal than MS going against hardcore abortion bans can work.

It worked pretty well for Wendy Davis....

Are we talking about the same Missouri that re-elected Claire McCaskill by 16% because of her oponent’s extreme stance on abortion?

Defending rapists =/= Being pro life

splitting hairs. He made that a part of his abortion stance defense.

Back to the matter, yeah this is a Likely R race. But not safe. Never underestimate the ability of the Missouri GOP to screw up. These are the same idiots who, in reverse chronological order:

1. Managed to get an unelected Democrat re-elected State Auditor by running a fraud against her
2. Put an inexperienced egotist who happened to be a rapist in the Governor’s office
3. Nearly pissed away a Senate seat in 2016 despite Trump landslide get
4. Actually pissed away a Senate seat in 2012 along with all but one row office
To be fair they managed to fix’s the problem throwing out a scandal government and putting a possible future president or Vice President nominee in to a senate seat.
Logged
Flyersfan232
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,928


« Reply #2 on: September 19, 2019, 07:49:37 PM »

She will get 45% minimum.

I know she defeated a literal crazy person but now that she won her election she has more good will.

Galloway seems lucky as a rule. I would not be shocked if that luck continues

Claire McCaskill was lucky too, until she wasn't.

This is a Presidential year, McCaskill won in 2012, in a presidential year, MO does vote GOP in presidential years, but Trump might only win MO by 6, not 11
Unless Parsons said something crazy or kills Jordan winninngton or wearing a I love Stan t shirt he going to be fine.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.