FCC considering allowing profanity and non-sexual nudity (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 01:30:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  FCC considering allowing profanity and non-sexual nudity (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you agree?
#1
Yes (D)
 
#2
No (D)
 
#3
Yes (R)
 
#4
No (R)
 
#5
Yes (I/O)
 
#6
No (I/O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 87

Author Topic: FCC considering allowing profanity and non-sexual nudity  (Read 4917 times)
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,305
United States


« on: April 12, 2013, 08:14:53 PM »

I actually agree. We seem to be more concerned about protecting children from nudity and profanity, rather than bullying, exposure to violence, racial/sexual epithets, hate, where the latter group is more harmful to children. Even the male enhancement ads are more questionable than some profanity/nudity.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,305
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2013, 06:38:24 PM »

Very pleased at the results of this poll as a local radio station opened comments on this on Facebook and most comments were against. Perhaps we're finally challenging the absurd sex (and nudity and profanity)/violence double standard.

That said, this site has a higher percent of young, childless people which would make it more supportive of relaxing the policy.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.