California Senate 2024 - Schiff (D) vs Garvey (R) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 30, 2024, 01:58:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  California Senate 2024 - Schiff (D) vs Garvey (R) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: California Senate 2024 - Schiff (D) vs Garvey (R)  (Read 68788 times)
MRS DONNA SHALALA
cuddlebuns
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 604
South Africa


« on: March 22, 2024, 01:34:08 PM »

So what explains the fact Adam Schiff got 144,000 fewer votes in the special than he did in the regular primary? The special actually had 82,000 more total votes and there were far fewer minor candidates to siphon off votes so you would think everyone's total would go up and in fact every other candidate in the special did get more votes than they did in the regular primary. Is it as simple as Democratic voters giving Lee or Porter a sort of consolation prize?

To be clear I don't think this has any significance, I just found it an oddity.

I think it's people being confused by the ballot ("I can't vote for these people twice!, that's illegal!"), and leaving the Special blank so as to not risk spoiling their ballot. Honestly not surprised there's more dropoff.
Logged
MRS DONNA SHALALA
cuddlebuns
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 604
South Africa


« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2024, 01:47:37 PM »

So what explains the fact Adam Schiff got 144,000 fewer votes in the special than he did in the regular primary? The special actually had 82,000 more total votes and there were far fewer minor candidates to siphon off votes so you would think everyone's total would go up and in fact every other candidate in the special did get more votes than they did in the regular primary. Is it as simple as Democratic voters giving Lee or Porter a sort of consolation prize?

To be clear I don't think this has any significance, I just found it an oddity.

I think it's people being confused by the ballot ("I can't vote for these people twice!, that's illegal!"), and leaving the Special blank so as to not risk spoiling their ballot. Honestly not surprised there's more dropoff.

But the special had more total votes. Also Garvey had more votes in the special than the regular primary so Republicans didn't appear to be confused as to how many times they could vote for a candidate.

Ah whoops, missed that bit. In that case the ranked-choice theory makes sense, but otherwise no idea why that might have happened.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.