Gold Standard Gravis (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 03:06:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Gold Standard Gravis (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Gold Standard Gravis  (Read 638 times)
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,625
« on: November 21, 2018, 03:27:35 PM »
Quote from: Virginiá on November 21, 2018, 03:23:40 PM
In all seriousness, does Gravis even deserve the shame it gets on here anymore? Can a decent case be made for why they do, post-2018?

Ok Gravis has 2 parts for me
Regular Polls
These are generally meh polls like B- or C+ tier on 538 which I find fine and Ill throw into the pile. They probably got a bit lucky this cycle

Internals: These are absolute garbage and where they should be thrown out(was it the Schrader poll that was +25) Anyway some of those numbers are physically impossible.
Logged
lfromnj
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,625
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2018, 03:30:52 PM »
Quote from: Thatkat04 on November 21, 2018, 03:27:32 PM
Quote from: Virginiá on November 21, 2018, 03:23:40 PM
In all seriousness, does Gravis even deserve the shame it gets on here anymore? Can a decent case be made for why they do, post-2018?

I think the issue with both Gravid and Emerson is that they post complete outliers only to fall in line closer to the election.

No Emerson is generally fine even with margin
its just they HAVE SO MANY ING UNDECIDEDs early.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 10 queries.