If Crimea had a fair referendum in 2014 what percent of the vote would joining Russia have recieved? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 10, 2024, 07:39:55 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  If Crimea had a fair referendum in 2014 what percent of the vote would joining Russia have recieved? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
<30
 
#2
30-40
 
#3
40-50
 
#4
50-60
 
#5
60-70
 
#6
>70
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 50

Author Topic: If Crimea had a fair referendum in 2014 what percent of the vote would joining Russia have recieved?  (Read 1310 times)
BigSerg
7sergi9
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,264


« on: September 23, 2023, 11:11:21 PM »

probably high 50s I guess.
Of course, similar referenda on the issue in Luhansk and Donetsk would likely have gotten around the low 40s at the absolute most.
This is my thinking pre everything.

BigSerg fails to realize his self selected circle of friends are not representative of the population. For all his hysteria over how Westerners are biased, he is too and doesn’t admit it.

Quote
Nevertheless, on the ground in Crimea, prevailing opinion at the inter-state and state level does not matter. ‘Reunification’ with Russia enjoys considerable legitimacy within Crimea among most of the peninsula’s population. It is also considered legitimate within Russia itself, where, in 2014, polls revealed rising levels of support for the annexation from 64% in March to 73% in September.

Our highlighting of the conundrum is based on the results of a public opinion survey we organised on the Crimean peninsula in December 2014. The survey was a random scientific survey of 750 respondents administered by the Levada Center, a Moscow-based polling firm with a reputation for integrity, professionalism and independence. We have worked with the Levada Center for over a decade on public opinion polling, within the Russian Federation in 2002, in the North Caucasus in 2005, and in the breakaway Georgian region of Abkhazia in 2010.


https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/crimean-conundrum/
Logged
BigSerg
7sergi9
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,264


« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2023, 10:35:30 AM »
« Edited: September 24, 2023, 10:41:26 AM by BigSerg »

That survey was in December 2014, *after* the de facto annexation.

I would be rather more interested in any reliable polling taken leading up to it.

You got it, from our own 2013 government. The results are close, before the Maiden disaster. So yes, it's pretty obvious that joining Russia would have won.

https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnaec705.pdf





Logged
BigSerg
7sergi9
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,264


« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2023, 12:17:57 PM »
« Edited: September 24, 2023, 12:23:18 PM by BigSerg »

Only 23%-33% in favor of outright separatism is even lower then I remember - and it is consistent with what Andrew Wilson wrote on the subject, a referendum in 2014, a real one, would have been extremely close. There was an Antimaidan movement but only a minority of this movement were outright separatists, it speaks volumes that the Antimaidan extremists were never ever to replicate what happened in Kyiv in the eastern provinces, and would have accomplished absolutely nothing without poorly concealed Russian military support.

A sniveling coward like the above poster who has no respect for himself or humanity would not acknowledge this however. I say this because it is important for others to know he is lying. I mean…he called an over 20 point lead close.

Nice try, troll.






https://www.usagm.gov/wp-content/media/2014/06/Ukraine-slide-deck.pdf
http://avaazpress.s3.amazonaws.com/558_Crimea.Referendum.Poll.GfK.pdf
Logged
BigSerg
7sergi9
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,264


« Reply #3 on: September 24, 2023, 12:21:38 PM »

That survey was in December 2014, *after* the de facto annexation.

I would be rather more interested in any reliable polling taken leading up to it.

It’s pretty much impossible given that Crimea was taken so soon after Maiden . So there wasn’t Anytime to get accurate polling on the issue before it happened

This has aged pretty badly, you should have waited a few seconds. GFK, the leading German pollster did a poll just before the referendum, there was an overwhelming majority in favor of Russia (70%).

http://avaazpress.s3.amazonaws.com/558_Crimea.Referendum.Poll.GfK.pdf
Logged
BigSerg
7sergi9
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,264


« Reply #4 on: September 24, 2023, 12:28:52 PM »

I'm not sure what BigSerg is trying to prove with those poll numbers - they are either after March 2014 and therefore irrelevant, disprove his own point, or are wildly inconsistent with themselves. It is deeply ironic to hear him calling myself a troll when he knows nothing of Ukrainian history or politics beyond the propaganda lines he uncritically accepts from the depths of the degenerate pro-war Russian blogosphere.

From 2009 to 2011 in the UN poll the numbers were consistent, don't try to manipulate things. The GFK poll was before the referendum and showed a similar result to the other polls. Literally all the data showed considerable support for union with Russia. Dude, you didn't even know Crimea was part of Russia until the 50s. It's pretty clear who is the illiterate regarding the Ukrainian situation.
Logged
BigSerg
7sergi9
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,264


« Reply #5 on: September 24, 2023, 12:33:28 PM »

Only 23%-33% in favor of outright separatism is even lower then I remember - and it is consistent with what Andrew Wilson wrote on the subject, a referendum in 2014, a real one, would have been extremely close. There was an Antimaidan movement but only a minority of this movement were outright separatists, it speaks volumes that the Antimaidan extremists were never ever to replicate what happened in Kyiv in the eastern provinces, and would have accomplished absolutely nothing without poorly concealed Russian military support.

A sniveling coward like the above poster who has no respect for himself or humanity would not acknowledge this however. I say this because it is important for others to know he is lying. I mean…he called an over 20 point lead close.

That's the way it is with these people. "I lie" being the only one who has shown consistent, independent polls from reliable sources, while the other guy...or yes, he has the always reliable, Trust me bro.
Logged
BigSerg
7sergi9
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,264


« Reply #6 on: September 24, 2023, 12:40:24 PM »

I'm not sure what BigSerg is trying to prove with those poll numbers - they are either after March 2014 and therefore irrelevant, disprove his own point, or are wildly inconsistent with themselves. It is deeply ironic to hear him calling myself a troll when he knows nothing of Ukrainian history or politics beyond the propaganda lines he uncritically accepts from the depths of the degenerate pro-war Russian blogosphere.

From 2009 to 2011 in the UN poll the numbers were consistent, don't try to manipulate things. The GFK poll was before the referendum and showed a similar result to the other polls. Literally all the data showed considerable support for union with Russia. Dude, you didn't even know Crimea was part of Russia until the 50s. It's pretty clear who is the illiterate regarding the Ukrainian situation.

1. The same poll had residents supporting remaining within the Ukrainian state, the entire article talks non stop about the unreliability of polling in perceiving societal attitudes on this subject, and the article also mentions the poll you cited before.
2. What are you talking about? I am very well aware of the existence of the Crimean ASSR and its transfer from the RSFSR to the Ukrainian SSR. I am also aware of the 1991 Status Referendum which received a majority in Crimea to vindicate that transfer, and I am aware of the 2014 coup d'tat which ousted the legitimate government the Crimean Autonomous Republic and installed a Russian puppet regime.

Obvious troll, says obvious nonsense. The 1991 referendum was not a question of joining Russia or not, it was a scam concocted by the Western puppet government in which there was no option to join Russia.
Logged
BigSerg
7sergi9
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,264


« Reply #7 on: September 24, 2023, 12:53:18 PM »

Even by your own sources, you are more or less admitting indirectly that Donbas and Luhansk would NOT vote to be in Russia. And yet you support the genocide there…

Before Maiden? I have no problem admitting it, after that, it's pretty obvious that most wanted to integrate into Russia, especially after 8 years of war, where both sides were killing each other and propaganda was doing its job. You had giant screens in the streets of Donbass broadcasting how Poroshenko was literally advocating genocide.
Logged
BigSerg
7sergi9
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,264


« Reply #8 on: September 24, 2023, 12:59:10 PM »

Even by your own sources, you are more or less admitting indirectly that Donbas and Luhansk would NOT vote to be in Russia. And yet you support the genocide there…

Before Maiden? I have no problem admitting it, after that, it's pretty obvious that most wanted to integrate into Russia, especially after 8 years of war, where both sides were killing each other and propaganda was doing its job. You had giant screens in the streets of Donbass broadcasting how Poroshenko was literally advocating genocide.
See you can’t make this stuff up! Donbas and Luhansk should be free from Ukraine because Russian propaganda is working!

"See you can’t make this stuff up!"

“And we win together by means of peace! Because we have jobs, and they have not. We have pensions, and they have not. We have support of children and pensioners, they have not. Our children would go to kindergartens and schools, theirs would be sitting in cellars. Because they do not know anything how to do! That’s how we are going to win this war. Because wars are won in minds, and not on the combat fields! They do not know this, but I know. And I have your support, I need it very much in order we win this war without perished Ukrainians, without perished inhabitants of Odesa.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr0TUpyPOJg&t=3030s
Logged
BigSerg
7sergi9
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,264


« Reply #9 on: September 24, 2023, 01:03:23 PM »

Even by your own sources, you are more or less admitting indirectly that Donbas and Luhansk would NOT vote to be in Russia. And yet you support the genocide there…
Before Maiden? I have no problem admitting it, after that, it's pretty obvious that most wanted to integrate into Russia, especially after 8 years of war, where both sides were killing each other and propaganda was doing its job. You had giant screens in the streets of Donbass broadcasting how Poroshenko was literally advocating genocide.
See you can’t make this stuff up! Donbas and Luhansk should be free from Ukraine because Russian propaganda is working!

"See you can’t make this stuff up!"

“And we win together by means of peace! Because we have jobs, and they have not. We have pensions, and they have not. We have support of children and pensioners, they have not. Our children would go to kindergartens and schools, theirs would be sitting in cellars. Because they do not know anything how to do! That’s how we are going to win this war. Because wars are won in minds, and not on the combat fields! They do not know this, but I know. And I have your support, I need it very much in order we win this war without perished Ukrainians, without perished inhabitants of Odesa.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr0TUpyPOJg&t=3030s
So you support unwarranted invasions, genocide, and brainwashing? Good to know, time to finish what Polk started! Better move to Guatemala!

*running out of argument, proceeds to spout verbiage
Logged
BigSerg
7sergi9
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,264


« Reply #10 on: September 24, 2023, 01:05:58 PM »

This Poroshenko quote is oft repeated in Russian propaganda, these people are very repetitive and unoriginal. It's pretty obvious to a reasonable observer Poroshenko is not calling for a mass killing of the population of the Donbas, he's making the case that the positive development of Ukraine in contrast with the ongoing conflict there will move the people of Donbas towards reconciliation with Kyiv.

But he didn't mean that! *proceed to say that I have said that I advocate genocide, that I have wished death on others, that I lie, etc....
Logged
BigSerg
7sergi9
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,264


« Reply #11 on: September 24, 2023, 01:08:47 PM »

Even by your own sources, you are more or less admitting indirectly that Donbas and Luhansk would NOT vote to be in Russia. And yet you support the genocide there…
Before Maiden? I have no problem admitting it, after that, it's pretty obvious that most wanted to integrate into Russia, especially after 8 years of war, where both sides were killing each other and propaganda was doing its job. You had giant screens in the streets of Donbass broadcasting how Poroshenko was literally advocating genocide.
See you can’t make this stuff up! Donbas and Luhansk should be free from Ukraine because Russian propaganda is working!

"See you can’t make this stuff up!"

“And we win together by means of peace! Because we have jobs, and they have not. We have pensions, and they have not. We have support of children and pensioners, they have not. Our children would go to kindergartens and schools, theirs would be sitting in cellars. Because they do not know anything how to do! That’s how we are going to win this war. Because wars are won in minds, and not on the combat fields! They do not know this, but I know. And I have your support, I need it very much in order we win this war without perished Ukrainians, without perished inhabitants of Odesa.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr0TUpyPOJg&t=3030s
So you support unwarranted invasions, genocide, and brainwashing? Good to know, time to finish what Polk started! Better move to Guatemala!

*running out of argument, proceeds to spout verbiage
I’m just using your own logic.
“As long as we brainwash and deport enough people after we invade, it’s okay!”

Logged
BigSerg
7sergi9
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,264


« Reply #12 on: September 24, 2023, 01:11:08 PM »

This Poroshenko quote is oft repeated in Russian propaganda, these people are very repetitive and unoriginal. It's pretty obvious to a reasonable observer Poroshenko is not calling for a mass killing of the population of the Donbas, he's making the case that the positive development of Ukraine in contrast with the ongoing conflict there will move the people of Donbas towards reconciliation with Kyiv.

But he didn't mean that! *proceed to say that I have said that I advocate genocide, that I have wished death on others, that I lie, etc....

I never said he didn't mean what he said. He very clearly did you're just the one lying about what's being said....

And yes you do all those things all the time, you are a liar and a genocide denier.

Logged
BigSerg
7sergi9
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,264


« Reply #13 on: September 24, 2023, 01:18:42 PM »

Even by your own sources, you are more or less admitting indirectly that Donbas and Luhansk would NOT vote to be in Russia. And yet you support the genocide there…
Before Maiden? I have no problem admitting it, after that, it's pretty obvious that most wanted to integrate into Russia, especially after 8 years of war, where both sides were killing each other and propaganda was doing its job. You had giant screens in the streets of Donbass broadcasting how Poroshenko was literally advocating genocide.
See you can’t make this stuff up! Donbas and Luhansk should be free from Ukraine because Russian propaganda is working!

"See you can’t make this stuff up!"

“And we win together by means of peace! Because we have jobs, and they have not. We have pensions, and they have not. We have support of children and pensioners, they have not. Our children would go to kindergartens and schools, theirs would be sitting in cellars. Because they do not know anything how to do! That’s how we are going to win this war. Because wars are won in minds, and not on the combat fields! They do not know this, but I know. And I have your support, I need it very much in order we win this war without perished Ukrainians, without perished inhabitants of Odesa.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr0TUpyPOJg&t=3030s
So you support unwarranted invasions, genocide, and brainwashing? Good to know, time to finish what Polk started! Better move to Guatemala!

*running out of argument, proceeds to spout verbiage
I’m just using your own logic.
“As long as we brainwash and deport enough people after we invade, it’s okay!”


It seems roughly 1/4 of Ukrainian refugees have found refuge in Russia. It would be interesting to see how they are doing. Both as individuals and as a group. Like what are they doing to survive, how are they coping with changing circumstances etc.

In reality, this percentage is increasing rapidly. Ukrainian refugees in Europe are being deported because, unlike Russia, Ukraine has been in general mobilization for more than a year. On social media you can see how Ukrainians are complaining because they are receiving mandatory summonses. This means that they are calling as many civilians as they can to go to the front. In Russia, on the contrary, there has only been a partial mobilization and only of those enlisted in military service.

https://news.yahoo.com/categories-men-returned-ukraine-abroad-124900860.html
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 14 queries.