Well, many attack sites first open with a spaghetti on the wall approach -- throw everything and see what sticks, and hone on the best arguments.
I understand that, but ... I'm saying that they didn't actually throw anything.
I think the best argument against Dudley is that he's utterly unqualified for the job [a couple years as a "financial planner" and as a union rep in the NBA are the qualifications he touts most often] and has incredibly shallow roots in the state.
Perhaps. But if that's the case, why not make the website focus on that first and foremost? It'd be more effective than the big ol' nothing that's clogging it up.