Poll: Name the winner in the great Georgia U.S. Senate runoff (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 01:53:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Poll: Name the winner in the great Georgia U.S. Senate runoff (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Name the winner in the great Georgia U.S. runoff
#1
Saxby Chambliss, Republican
 
#2
Jim Martin, Democrat
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 89

Author Topic: Poll: Name the winner in the great Georgia U.S. Senate runoff  (Read 27055 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: December 03, 2008, 04:35:16 AM »

Wow, Saxby Shameless brings out the absolute worst in Republican partisans.  And not much better sentiments in Democratic partisans either.

This horrible thread alone is almost grounds enough to have the man expelled from the Senate. Tongue



Yah, it often happens that when a candidate expected to win handily is forced into a second round, he does worse than anyone predicted there. Right after election day, it seemed possible that that would happen here. But it became obvious pretty quickly that it wouldn't, that it would be all about race and turnout. Still about a point or three more Republican than I would have thought likely.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2008, 05:02:50 AM »

(snipped true parts) If Martin really wanted to win this runoff he probably needed to get the blacks angry at the whites for some reason or another. I can't really see a way for him to get blacks to turnout besides that.
That would have destroyed him. He needed White votes too anyhow - he was caught between a rock and a hard place, tried to balance things (had to, of course. No other choice) and failed.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2008, 05:31:08 AM »

Anyways, Martin needed to either strongly appeal to black voters and drive up their turnout, or switch and attempt to strongly appeal to white voters and cut into Chambliss's margin (something which would've also been a miserable failure). Any balancing act was, of course, doomed to failure. I don't think it's really possible to run a campaign that appeals to both Southern Blacks and Southern Whites these days.
Obama did in North Carolina.

Of course, local on the ground dynamics look quite a bit different in NC than in GA... Smiley
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2008, 05:58:20 AM »

Anyways, Martin needed to either strongly appeal to black voters and drive up their turnout, or switch and attempt to strongly appeal to white voters and cut into Chambliss's margin (something which would've also been a miserable failure). Any balancing act was, of course, doomed to failure. I don't think it's really possible to run a campaign that appeals to both Southern Blacks and Southern Whites these days.
Obama did in North Carolina.

Of course, local on the ground dynamics look quite a bit different in NC than in GA... Smiley

Mhmm.

Obama didn't really appeal to Southern Whites so much as Northern Whites who happened to be living in the South. That analysis may be simplistic though.
No, it goes much deeper than that. Georgia gets a lot of northern immigration too, ye know. But fewer of them are White Democrats - more are Conservative Whites, and more are Black.
Then, Georgia's declining bits are both more rural than North Carolina's, less hard hit by economic woes, and less traditionally Republican - in NC, Republicans basically are defending shrinking ground in some of those old mill towns the way Dems are in rural places elsewhere.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #4 on: December 03, 2008, 09:53:01 AM »

It might be impossible to even get close to reasonably accurate answers to this items, but I'd be curious to hear results:

1.  Percent turnout for black voters in GA for the Nov 4th election.
2.  Percent turnout for all other voters in GA for the Nov 4th election.
3.  Percent turnout for black voters in GA for the Dec 2nd election.
4.  Percent turnout for all other voters in GA for the Dec 2nd election.

My hunch is that 2 and 4 are much greater than 1 and 3, respectively.  Also, I'd guess that 1 is much greater than 3.

If Blacks made up 30% of the vote in November, 1 and 2 were probably right around equal. 4 was higher than 3, obviously, but closer to 3 than to 1 and 2 - total turnout was about  60% of November levels.

Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #5 on: December 03, 2008, 10:15:11 AM »

There's really only one surprising feature to last night's result; Martin's all-too-obvious collapse with rural white voters.

No kidding.  I thought his name started with an O looking at the results there.  Something to watch for this upcoming Saturday in LA-04 in my book.
as in, if anything looks like that, Fleming has won.

Then again, Fleming could do a quite bit worse and still win... and anyhow, Martin did a quite bit worse than Obama too (would need to check county by county whether that's everywhere though)
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #6 on: December 03, 2008, 12:52:46 PM »

Oh well. Let's compare some data...

statewide...

McCain 2.049 mio votes, Obama 1.844 mio votes, other 35k votes
Chambliss 1.867 mio votes, Martin 1.757 mio votes, other 128k votes
runoff (note: 97% reporting) Chambliss 1.221 mio votes, Martin 906k votes - less than half Obama's total. "You'd think his name begins in an O" is doing him some quite undeserved honors.

Some random counties...

Fulton, DeKalb, Clayton summed...

Obama 609k, McCain 212k, other 7k
Martin 559k, Chambliss 213k, other 23k. Yeah, Chambliss did marginally better than McCain here - more evidence of McCain's lack in metropolitan appeal
runoff (2 precincts out) Martin 314k, Chambliss 146k. Turnout held up better than statewide. For both candidates actually (Martin at 56% against 52% of his raw vote, Chambliss 68% vs 65%). I think this is probably important.

Fannin County (random rural Republican place in the north. Sam said to look north.)
McCain 7.8k, Obama 2.6k
Chambliss 6.5k, Martin 3.1k, other 500. Ah yes, Martin outpacing Obama.
runoff: Chambliss 4.2k, Martin 1.5k

Martin won a grand total of eight more counties than Obama in the first round. He must have won fewer in the second, but I was too lazy to count'em out.
If things were all about turnout by race, anyhow, one would imagine an above-average swing in places with sizable numbers of Blacks and Whites. So I went me with Obama's narrowest county wins. Problem was none of them was wholly in yet. Baker (in the deep south) isn't completely in yet, which in a small county (6 of 7 precincts reporting) can foul up results something bad. Martin is still barely ahead right now, though. Wonder if that'll change. Chattahoochee with 2 out of 3 precincts reporting (much of it is covered by an army base. But the populated parts of the army base are over in Muscogee County.) is just worthless.

Newton County is one of those outer metropolitan Black-trending counties...
Obama 20.8k, McCain 20.3k
Martin 20.2k, Chambliss 18.2k, other 1.2k. McCain metro weakness not in evidence this far out.
runoff: Chambliss 12.2k, Martin 10.3k. Hmmm... in line with state.

For a more definitely rural close county... argh. All the closeish Obama counties seem to have an unreported precinct. Eventually settled on Wilkinson. Which didn't vote for Obama.

McCain 2349, Obama 2298, other 23
Martin 2403, Chambliss 1980, other 73 - yeah, here we are on "Martin outperforming Obama" turf. Smiley
runoff: Martin 1310, Chambliss 1298. Huh

So, conclusion: I'm not all that much wiser than I used to be.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.031 seconds with 13 queries.