Bloomber spent 77 million on re-election campaign. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 12:00:15 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Bloomber spent 77 million on re-election campaign. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Bloomber spent 77 million on re-election campaign.  (Read 3505 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: December 06, 2005, 11:41:31 AM »
Waddawaste.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2005, 12:14:55 PM »
Quote from: HumanRights® (htmldon) on December 06, 2005, 11:45:56 AM
A waste for him, maybe - but I don't mind it at all when rich people "waste" money.  That 77 million dollars hired campaign workers, bought ads that employed production people, TV station employees, and it goes on and on from there.
Yes ... that's true of course. Then again, whether this was the most productive way he could've spent the money is another question.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #2 on: December 07, 2005, 02:14:10 PM »
Quote from: WalterMitty on December 06, 2005, 03:27:03 PM
you guys are missing the point...

bloomberg spent the money not because he was fearful of losing, but because he wanted to 'run up the score'.
Exactly ... that's why we considered it pointless.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 10 queries.