Would you have voted to confirm Ruth Bader Ginsburg? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 03:13:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Would you have voted to confirm Ruth Bader Ginsburg? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would you have voted to confirm Ruth Bader Ginsburg?
#1
yes
 
#2
no
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 44

Author Topic: Would you have voted to confirm Ruth Bader Ginsburg?  (Read 3793 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: October 05, 2005, 03:17:39 PM »

opebo, your time would be better spent fucking than commenting here.
While I'm sure Opebo agrees...


Anyways, what's so extremist? Where is she considerably to the left of Thurgood Marshall and what's his name...William O Douglas maybe...hope I'm thinking of the right name...?
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2005, 05:41:30 AM »

The whole prostitution and federal funding of abortions are constitutionally protected thing...  And how we should remove any reference to "he," "man," etc in the Constitution and replace it with "he/she," "man/woman" etc
The latter is personal taste and not a constitutional opinion though.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2005, 05:42:04 AM »

Anyways, what's so extremist? Where is she considerably to the left of Thurgood Marshall and what's his name...William O Douglas maybe...hope I'm thinking of the right name...?

Prostitution, abortion, pretty much anything tangenitally connected to her blanket federal right to privacy belief counts here.
She wasn't even on the court that invented that doctrine!
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2005, 04:31:26 AM »

She wasn't even on the court that invented that doctrine!

So you're saying someone needs to be involved in something to believe it?
How can you possibly be the most extreme justice ever for believing in the doctrines of a former (but recent) court. That's just logically absurd.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 14 queries.