the 2004 white vote (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 08, 2024, 06:21:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  the 2004 white vote (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: the 2004 white vote  (Read 9739 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: July 17, 2005, 12:19:50 PM »

NY and CA surprise me a bit, I suppose, but otherwise nothing to phone home about.

I'm also surprised that (possibly excluding African-Americans) CNN's exit polling say that whites were Kerry's strongest ethnic group in Hawaii.

Polynesians in Hawaii are very, very pro-incumbent.  Look at Nixon in 1972.

That was over thirty years ago!
It's still true. Pilipinos as well.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2005, 01:38:10 PM »

If Clark, or Edwards, or even Gephardt had been nominated, how would these maps have differed?

They may have differed somewhat, but probably not substantially.  No Democrat has won the white vote in any election since LBJ in 1964.

And no Republican has one the white vote in D.C. since Nixon.

There are no whites in DC other than UN types, so what difference does that make?

very very false. I doubt 30% of DC are UN workers.
He said UN types, not UN workers. Whatever he meant by that, people who approve of the UN's existence maybe? In that case he's probably right. Smiley
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2005, 02:31:53 AM »

Sure upstate NY would be a lean-Rep swing state without NYC & suburbs (exclude the exurbs as well if you want to have a realistic map), but it would have less than half of NY's EVs and be losing more fast, as nobody wants to move there.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #3 on: July 18, 2005, 04:09:20 AM »

Having a state government not really geared to their needs (including in the tax structure) is not going to help much, true. PA and IL have similar-ish situations of course, here too the states would likely be declining worse without the Philly and Chi burbs. Ohio isn't doing all that much better, though...although it probably is doing better.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #4 on: July 18, 2005, 05:24:56 AM »

One thing to note is that perceived highness of taxes, perceived friendliness to union etc may be more important in attracting private investment than reality.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #5 on: July 18, 2005, 09:18:53 AM »

Moreover, you can't just cut taxes and leave everything else as is...you'll have to either save or borrow.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #6 on: October 31, 2005, 05:34:01 AM »

New York City has voted Republican three times in history IIRC - for McKinley (96 only), Harding and Coolidge.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #7 on: November 01, 2005, 06:03:47 AM »

I do...somewhere...and only major parties (and Van Buren 1848 is lacking, which is a crying shame because the data for that year are really quite useless as a result). Back to 1840 or 1832 or something like that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.