Snyder v. Phelps (2011) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 10:23:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Constitution and Law (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Snyder v. Phelps (2011) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How would you have ruled?
#1
Majority		  
#2
Concurrence		  
#3
Dissent		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: Snyder v. Phelps (2011)  (Read 13096 times)
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« on: December 04, 2013, 06:47:11 AM »
Quote from: True Federalist on November 24, 2013, 11:01:34 PM
the defendant did comply with all the governmental hurdle that were in place to have his protest where he did.
Basically, that ought to be case open and shut right there.
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2013, 09:22:34 AM »
Well yeah, I would think that if Snyder had sued the local authorities for allowing the Phelpses there, he might conceivably have a case.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.