Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 45,027
![](./avatars/Democratic/D_NY.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: October 21, 2008, 03:47:43 PM » |
|
|
« edited: October 21, 2008, 03:49:41 PM by Resident of Fake America »
|
90%, while unlikely, isn't that ridiculous, if you're talking about registered voters. Obviously we're not going to have 90% of the eligible voting age populace turnout; I doubt that many are even registered.
Remember, in 2004 Colorado was 89%, Oregon was 86%, and Minnesota, Georgia and New Hampshire (three very different states) were at 79%. Virginia was at 76%. So it's certainly not impossible.
|