Petition to ban Woody/Sir Woodbury

[Beet]

Atlas had traditionally been a place that has had its own distinct character and political tilt, but also one with healthy amounts of posters with minority views. These posters with minority views are crucial to seeing this place as interesting as it is, and filling a niche as a place where people of wildly different positions can debate. So no, Woody should not be banned for his views, no matter how reprehensible, if his behavior does not violate the TOS.

After all, Netanyahu is a genocidal maniac who has killed more children in Gaza than Putin in Ukraine, yet no one has brought up banning Netanyahu supporters.

[Beet]

Atlas had traditionally been a place that has had its own distinct character and political tilt, but also one with healthy amounts of posters with minority views. These posters with minority views are crucial to seeing this place as interesting as it is, and filling a niche as a place where people of wildly different positions can debate. So no, Woody should not be banned for his views, no matter how reprehensible, if his behavior does not violate the TOS.

After all, Netanyahu is a genocidal maniac who has killed more children in Gaza than Putin in Ukraine, yet no one has brought up banning Netanyahu supporters.

Well vosem and Gmac got banned so mute point lol also we have no idea how many Ukrainian civilians have actually been killed seeing as UN is cut off from the Russian occupied territories and those areas are seeing the worst atrocities happen ala Bucha and Kherson

Well if they got banned simply for supporting Netanyahu, as opposed to specific behavior against the TOS, that shouldn't have happened either.

[Beet]

Atlas had traditionally been a place that has had its own distinct character and political tilt, but also one with healthy amounts of posters with minority views. These posters with minority views are crucial to seeing this place as interesting as it is, and filling a niche as a place where people of wildly different positions can debate. So no, Woody should not be banned for his views, no matter how reprehensible, if his behavior does not violate the TOS.

After all, Netanyahu is a genocidal maniac who has killed more children in Gaza than Putin in Ukraine, yet no one has brought up banning Netanyahu supporters.

This is an explicit blood libel reliant on the fact that 90% of the deaths in Ukraine are off-books in Russian-controlled cities that have been essentially liquidated.

I'm sorry, but the phrase you use refers to an ancient anti-semitic legend that I will not dignify with repeating here. It has nothing to do with my post. To clarify, I don't think there is anything related to Jewishness or being Jewish that is in any way relevant to what I regard as Netanyahu's atrocities. He has committed them as a human being, and would be equally guilty no matter which ethnic or religious groups he belonged to.