Who has done more opposing Bush? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 05:34:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Who has done more opposing Bush? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Who has done more opposing Bush?
#1
Russ Feingold
 
#2
Ralph Nader
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 26

Author Topic: Who has done more opposing Bush?  (Read 2072 times)
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,853
Ireland, Republic of


« on: November 03, 2007, 03:25:09 PM »

BRTD: making Democrat voters look like asses since 2000
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,853
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #1 on: November 04, 2007, 10:47:30 AM »

Why don't the pro-Nader hacks (who unsurprisingly are European and don't have to live under Bush) directly deal with the point? There are clearly Democrats doing more good than Nader, who really hasn't done jacksh!t since Bush has taken office.

(Has anyone else noticed that not a single American on this forum has said it would be better to vote for Nader in 2000 and it wouldn't have made an ounce of difference if Gore was President?)

Only Dumbs care, BRTD.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,853
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2007, 11:03:38 AM »

Seriously BRTD, this Ralph Nader obsession of yours really should have passed by now.

Apparently he needs a reason to bring all the hate on me. So he just puts words in mouth.

Funnily BRTD ignored Tweed's contribution to the debate.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,853
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2007, 01:10:19 PM »

Seriously BRTD, this Ralph Nader obsession of yours really should have passed by now.

It would if people would quit defending that piece of human sh!t and actually argue voting for him in 2000 was a good thing because Gore and Bush are absolutely identical.

Who here has ever argued that?

People have the right to choose who they want to vote for, remember in 2000 the dangers of a Bush presidency were not so apparent and clear as now and this, like everything else, would have been forgotten except by a coterie of Historians and polly junkies like us if not for 9\11. Nader has a right to run for president and people have a right to vote for Nader for president, no?

Anyways many on the left were sick of Clinton trick of running from the left and governing from the right. Observe:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=468

And can you please respond to the uncomfortable truth above this time instead of going "OMG NADER!1111".
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,853
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2007, 10:08:37 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Wow. Even by your standards that is a particularly pathetic arguement to make.

And I have criticized Ralph Nader decision to run in 2004 many times here before. As it split the Green Party and seemed like an ego trip (That doesn't mean I hate him or think he shouldn't have been allowed to run). This is no new opinion coming from me. But you just think I have some Ralph Nader love in.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 11 queries.