Glossolalia/Speaking in Tongues (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 02:57:38 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Glossolalia/Speaking in Tongues (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What's your understanding of the Biblical "gift of tongues"?
#1
The gift expired with the early church.
 
#2
The gift is still extant today.
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 15

Author Topic: Glossolalia/Speaking in Tongues  (Read 7307 times)
JSojourner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,514
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94

« on: February 15, 2008, 09:53:13 PM »

Just curious...

And I wanted to move us away from the some of the other threads
Logged
JSojourner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,514
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94

« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2008, 01:11:37 PM »

I've traveled in both Pentecostal and decidedly non-Pentecostal circles. At Bible College, I was taught that there was one gift of tongues -- a divinely-given ability to speak other human languages, without prior knowledge of that tongue on the part of the speaker. The purpose of this gift was simply to communicate the Gospel message to those who needed to hear it in their language.  The use of this gift is recounted in Acts. My professors taught me that this gift ceased, along with other "sign" gifts like divine healing and word of knowledge, when the Early Church Age came to an end.

In Pentecostal circles, theologians believe there are two gifts of tongues.  One is the aforementioned ability to communicate in known languages, when the speaker has no training. But they also insist there is a second kind of "gift of tongues"....one St. Paul made reference to when he referred to the "tongues of humans and the tongues of angels".  In short, this second "gift" is supposed to be a heavenly language spoken for two purposes --  personal edification and communication of direct, Divine messages from God (similar to word of knowledge). 

There is some Scriptural support for the Pentecostal position --  Paul says "he who speaks in a tongue edifies himself".  Evidently, the speaker he is referring to in this case is not speaking to an audience.  Could this be the "tongues of angels" the apostle referred to in First Corinthians?  I think so.

As to whether these gifts ended with the early church, there is no Scriptural evidence for this whatsoever.  St. Paul does say, "Where there are tongues, they shall be silenced."  But he goes on to clarify that the only reason the gift would end would be as a result of a lack of love.  "Where there is no love, tongues shall cease..." (and so will the other gifts).

Unfortunately, though I find myself agreeing with Pentecostals on something (which is mind-boggling, if you know me) -- I can't embrace or support tongues speaking.  For many reasons.  I have seen in practiced in dozens of churches in my lifetime and each time, it has sounded bizarrely constructed and "made up" on the spot.  It has functioned more like a kind of spiritual masturbation than anything resembling a prophetic attempt to encourage the church.  And when there has been a prophetic word spoken, it has always been generic in the extreme.  "Oh my people, I will do great things among you if you will but yield to me." If that's the message, it's already in the Bible.  Do we really need sister Lurleen to repeat it in a tongue?

But worse, I have had Pentecostal pastors tell me that if I do not speak in tongues, it means I was never a Christian in the first place or -- I might be a Christian, but I am not a very good one.  They refer to churches that do not engage in the practice as "dead" or not "spirit-filled". What utter hooey.  One pastor, a man I really loved, tried to teach me how to speak in tongues.  His advice?  "Just start speaking nonsense like -- 'shallaballa bannasoya' and then let the Holy Ghost take over.  I was so disappointed in him, because he really did so many wonderful things in the community.

In my church, The Episcopal Church, there is a tongues-speaking branch called The Charismatic Episcopal Church.  I attend a non-Charismatic EC but my encounters with the CEC have been good.  They haven't come across as hardcore as folks in The Assemblies of God, Vineyard Christian Fellowship, Calvary Chapel and United Pentecostal Churches.  But still -- I worry about any faith tradition when a person's salvation or quality of Christian life is judged on the basis of what spiritual gifts they possess or exercise.  Didn't the Apostle Paul refer to tongues as "the least of the gifts" after all?

My bottom line?  The gift may be extant today.  It may be extinct today.  I don't know.  I know only that when it is used to beat up on others spiritually, it's definitely not of God. 

What, if any, experiences have you had in Charismatic or Pentecostal circles?

Logged
JSojourner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,514
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -6.94

« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2008, 04:39:52 PM »

The church I attended as a child was invaded by pentacostals in the early 1990s - they would "pray in tongues" and it terrified me. My grandfather got into it, and he had a church group around they started praying in tongues and the lights went out - my mother shouted at them to stop, and the lights came back on.

I consider it on par to the ouija board - it's attempting to know and harness spiritual energy, and sometimes it's not good.

not all speaking in tongues is done in the midst of chaos

To be fair, Jmcfst is correct.  There are a small number of churches that believe the gift is extant today but practice rigid and strict controls on how it is exercised.  I attended one here in Fort Wayne for a couple years that would not permit anyone to speak in tongues or speak a word of knowledge in English before the congregation.  They were required to bring that word to the pastor and the board of elders.  They church leadership would then, through prayer and study of the Bible, determine if the tongue or word was Biblical.  If so, the pastor or an elder would deliver the translation of that word to the congregation.  I greatly admired this and thought it had much more integrity that what I had experienced in Assembly of God, Pentecostal and other such churches.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 13 queries.