Change in conventional wisdom? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 07:30:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Change in conventional wisdom? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Change in conventional wisdom?  (Read 1489 times)
Roll Roons
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,128
United States


« on: May 04, 2021, 06:56:19 PM »

Regression to the mean.  Expected outcome has always been a mildly Republican year, enough that the House is a near certain flip, but the Senate still could go either way.

It’s strongly debatable whether the Senate could go "either way" in a mildly Republican year if D.C. and PR aren’t added. "Either way" to me implies a 50/50 situation, which probably would require a neutral year rather than a "mildly Republican" one given the partisan leans of the battleground states.

That's fair, but one is probably 60/40 R and the other is 90/10 R.

How would you rank the seats from most likely to least to go R, out of curiosity? Mine is FL>WI>NC>PA>AZ>NH>NV>GA.

I'd put WI ahead of NC for Dems in 2022. Johnson is problematic with all of his statements and WWC dropoff in a midterm might hurt the Rs more.

I agree. Also, the fact is that Democrats have been able to win federal statewide elections in Wisconsin, but with the exception of 2008, have consistently fallen short in North Carolina.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 10 queries.