Regardless of what these medical professionals end up deciding, Link, surely it does us no harm to, even if only provisionally, respect Manning's wishes for the time being rather than going out of our way to justify not so doing.
I understand that some people feel that way. What I took exception to is the idea that just because some of us would defer to prudent medical science and proceed with caution that we are somehow against gender reassignment. Nothing could be further from the truth. Two years ago I said this guy probably needs psychiatric help. Since that time he's been thrown in a dark hole and rammed through a military trial. If he were my friend or son before calling him "she" I would get him a lot of help and let things settle down before making big decisions.
Remember I didn't come into this thread and say everyone needs to stop calling him "her". No, someone else came in and corrected me and several other people made some inaccurate comments about what I said.
You're upset because somebody correct you... so you have gone waaay out of your way to prove how legit you are on this issue because, gais, gais... I know he-shes so like.... trust me on this... amiright?
I've had some major issues of my own with difficulty accepting transgender people. Hell, I spent 2 hours trying to convince former poster winston to accept that she had a male body and she couldn't truly be either gender until she accepted that....
It was all well meaning, but it was misguided, and I learned a valuable lesson. If someone asks that you call them she because she wants to live as a woman from this point forward... then yes, the common courtesy is to refer to her as "she" or "her".
Link... you spin circles around and around to avoid admitting you're wrong. Just admit it!
When I made the claim that wooden stick houses might be more renewable than the methods they used in England, you came back with compelling statistics that showed the opposite. I was wrong. It sucks... but I was.
Now it's your turn...