Yes, and? Rightly or wrongly, the vast majority of Americans share my position on this sort of stuff. Most people would have serious concerns about the values and basic fitness for office of a sex worker or porn star who tried to enter politics and you’re only fooling yourself if you try to pretend otherwise. And you can’t even dismiss it as “something something two consenting adults” when she engaged in sexual harassment against a non-consenting third party as well.
No offense, but the idea that we shouldn’t seriously question the judgement of anyone who is running for office despite broadcasting sex tapes of themself online is laughable. This woman clearly lacks the basic common sense and decision-making abilities to be entrusted with public office.
You can talk about it not being 1925 all you want and a lot has changed, but you’re either letting partisanship cloud your objectivity here or you’re simply wildly out of touch with most Americans on this sort of stuff.
If she actually exposed herself to a hotel employee, that’s an entirely different issue, and would be disqualifying. However, this detail hasn’t been substantiated by a credible source.
You can’t just say “most people agree with me” and call it a day. This forum is supposed to be more sophisticated than the lizard brain of the median voter.
Why do you view her posting the videos as disqualifying?
Why do you view it as a demonstration of lack of judgement on her part? There’s nothing morally wrong with doing consensual sex work.
