Opinion of Forced Savings/Insurance Schemes (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 09, 2024, 09:05:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Opinion of Forced Savings/Insurance Schemes (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: It's your choose
#1
Freedom Policies
 
#2
Horrible Policies
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 56

Author Topic: Opinion of Forced Savings/Insurance Schemes  (Read 4523 times)
SPC
Chuck Hagel 08
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,003
Latvia


« on: August 18, 2014, 11:35:56 AM »


It is a bit counterproductive to tax earnings if the objective is to encourage savings. Taxing consumption would be a superior method of encouraging savings, and slightly less regressive as well. In any event, I concur with Deus's reasoning that, while the objective of encouraging savings is noble, the implementation of it by its very nature diverts such savings from more productive uses. Of course, it is peculiar that there is overlap between the individuals that advocate Social Security on the basis that it is necessary in order to ensure that people save money for retirement seem to have no problem with a monetary system that is inflationary by its very nature, thus both encouraging present consumption at the expense of saving and robbing Social Security recipients from receiving the full value of their coerced savings.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 12 queries.