Rethinking McGovern (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 08:05:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Rethinking McGovern (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Does George McGovern's 1972 presidential campaign deserve a positive reevaluation?
#1
Yes (D)		  
#2
Yes (R)		  
#3
Yes (I/O)		  
#4
No (D)		  
#5
No (R)		  
#6
No (I/O)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 13

Author Topic: Rethinking McGovern  (Read 499 times)
Verily
Cuivienen
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,663


Political Matrix
E: 1.81, S: -6.78
« on: April 24, 2009, 01:13:48 PM »
He got crushed. You can't get crushed and have run a good campaign. No, there is nothing to say: McGovern was an awful candidate who ran an awful campaign.

(This is irrespective of whether he would have been a good President; I think most people here would agree that Adlai Stevenson would have been a great President, but he was really bad at campaigning.)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.