CNBC/Hart Research (NBC/WSJ) National: Clinton +9 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 05:02:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  CNBC/Hart Research (NBC/WSJ) National: Clinton +9 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: CNBC/Hart Research (NBC/WSJ) National: Clinton +9  (Read 1370 times)
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« on: October 27, 2016, 06:48:22 AM »

the volatility is mad and influencing my trust in the average.

Its really not that volatile. Everything outside of **** trackers are within a reasonable range.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2016, 06:57:53 AM »

It says this is a doubling of Clinton's lead since the last poll, does anyone know what those results where?

The last poll was in June.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2016, 06:22:30 PM »

On one hand, i find it odd that there's so much variation of national numbers. On the other hand, I recognize that it is entirely Trump varying from 40% to 45%, while Clinton's variations are between 49-53%.

There's always variation though. I kind of wonder what Atlas's reaction was to the polls on the eve of the election showing McCain only down 2 nationally and down 3 in Minnesota. Was the forum full of bedwetters, concern trolls, and doom prophecies then too?

Yes, but not QUITE as bad.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2016, 06:47:57 PM »

On one hand, i find it odd that there's so much variation of national numbers. On the other hand, I recognize that it is entirely Trump varying from 40% to 45%, while Clinton's variations are between 49-53%.

There's always variation though. I kind of wonder what Atlas's reaction was to the polls on the eve of the election showing McCain only down 2 nationally and down 3 in Minnesota. Was the forum full of bedwetters, concern trolls, and doom prophecies then too?

I was not a member of Atlas back then but there was persistent buzz about a whitey tape in which Michelle Obama makes racially charged statements against white people. That was supposed to be the October surprise but it never materialised.

Only the MOST delusional GOPhers believed the Whitey tape existed.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.